Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
The Latest
Community Notes Alone Won't Beat Disinformation: Why Fact-Checkers Are Essential
News commentary Tech Policy Press ·Iran is Winning — According to Misleading Images and Videos
News NewsGuard's Reality Check ·Hegseth deceptively suggests that Scouting America had banned trans youth. Here’s the truth.
News Media Nation ·A fact check of Trump’s State of the Union finds exaggerations on inflation, gas prices and immigration
News Poynter ·FactChecking Trump’s State of the Union Address
News FactCheck.org ·GlobalFact 2026 in Vilnius, Lithuania, opens registration for June conference
News release Poynter ·Did President Trump call into C-SPAN under a fake name?
News Poynter ·Why Canada still doesn’t have a full-time fact-checking beat
News Poynter ·Viral posts falsely name Savannah Guthrie’s husband as a ‘co-conspirator’ in the Epstein files
News Poynter ·DHS's pack of liars
News commentary presswatchers.org ·Welcome to the anti-trans outrage factory
News jessk.org ·MAGA’s Hopped Up Outrage
News Status ·in brief
Fact checking: not a tool for all seasons
It was love at first sight, but over time, my ardor has cooled. I still believe there is value in cataloging misstatements, exaggerations, and, well, lies. But when government policies are undertaken and justified by nothing more than a fever-dream of fantasy and fiction, fact checking doesn’t meet the moment.
Sept. 27, 2024