Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
The Latest
Do you know Trump and Harris’ talking points? Prep for the presidential debate with these fact checks
News Poynter ·Yes, debate moderators should fact-check the presidential candidates
News commentary Poynter ·RFK Jr. suspended his 2024 presidential bid. Here are 6 fact checks from his campaign
News Poynter ·The nuances of Biden’s 8% statement show why he was right — and why PolitiFact was wrong
News commentary Media Nation ·Fact-Checking Harris’s Speech and More: Day 4 of the D.N.C.
News The New York Times ·Fact-checking Kamala Harris at the Democratic convention on Day 4
News The Washington Post ·Fact-checking Day 2 of the 2024 Democratic National Convention
News The Washington Post ·Fact check: What Walz, Buttigieg, Clinton and others got right and wrong at Day 3 of the DNC
News Poynter ·Why Can’t Fact Checkers Handle Donald Trump?
News Rolling Stone ·'Fact-checking' does a (hopefully fatal) face plant
News commentary Press Watch ·Fact check: What the Obamas and other Democratic speakers got right, wrong on Day 2 of the DNC
News Poynter ·in brief
Fact checking: not a tool for all seasons
It was love at first sight, but over time, my ardor has cooled. I still believe there is value in cataloging misstatements, exaggerations, and, well, lies. But when government policies are undertaken and justified by nothing more than a fever-dream of fantasy and fiction, fact checking doesn’t meet the moment.
Sept. 27, 2024