Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
The Latest
Newsrooms confront lies and win
News Nieman Lab ·CNN investigates its own story and sets the record straight
News Poynter ·Q&A: Indian fact-checkers lead with innovation and diversity, says IFCN director after Delhi visit
News Poynter ·It’s moments like these when CNN shows its value
News commentary Poynter ·Donald Trump’s interview with ‘Meet the Press,’ fact-checked
News Poynter ·The next chapter for fact-checking: information integrity
News Poynter ·Africa’s fact-checking community shows its growing strength in collaboration, investigations
News Poynter ·Online influencers need ‘urgent’ fact-checking training, warns Unesco
News Digital media | The Guardian ·On Facebook, Elon Musk is an invention superhero. But much of it is made-up and features AI images
News Poynter ·Could Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ban vaccines as HHS secretary?
News Poynter ·in brief
Fact checking: not a tool for all seasons
It was love at first sight, but over time, my ardor has cooled. I still believe there is value in cataloging misstatements, exaggerations, and, well, lies. But when government policies are undertaken and justified by nothing more than a fever-dream of fantasy and fiction, fact checking doesn’t meet the moment.
Sept. 27, 2024