Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
The Latest
I used AI chatbots as a source of news for a month, and they were unreliable and erroneous
News J-Source ·IFCN awards $750,000 to 25 fact-checkers navigating a funding crisis
News release Poynter ·No, Seth Harp Didn’t Dox a Delta Force Commander
News Columbia Journalism Review ·George Floyd and Renee Good: 5 years between Minneapolis videos, and confusion has increased
News analysis apnews.com ·The truth about being a white man in America
News commentary Popular Information ·Kill, smear, cover-up
News commentary Popular Information ·The Trump Lie About Europe and Why it Matters
News commentary Tech Policy Press ·Reality still matters
News commentary The Verge ·This Is Not a Secret Conspiracy—Just Ask Local Journalists
News Columbia Journalism Review ·The White House said Maduro was ‘flooding’ the US with fentanyl. Experts and official reports disagree.
News Poynter ·The right-wing dehumanization machine is speeding up
News commentary Public Notice ·White House Debuts January 6th Revisionist History Website As Democrats Mark 5th Anniversary Attack On Capitol
News deadline.com ·in brief
Fact checking: not a tool for all seasons
It was love at first sight, but over time, my ardor has cooled. I still believe there is value in cataloging misstatements, exaggerations, and, well, lies. But when government policies are undertaken and justified by nothing more than a fever-dream of fantasy and fiction, fact checking doesn’t meet the moment.
Sept. 27, 2024