Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
The Latest
Will Americans really get $2,000 from Trump’s tariff ‘dividend’? Experts say don’t count on it.
News Poynter ·Trump Falsely Claims Democrats Want $1.5 Trillion for ‘Illegal Aliens’
News FactCheck.org ·Walmart Is Not Leading a Corporate Exodus from New York Over Mamdani
News NewsGuard's Reality Check ·'Please do something, President Trump'
News view.newsletters.cnn.com ·Explaining Democrats’ Request to Restore Foreign Aid
News FactCheck.org ·X Is Using AI Fact-Checkers
News Columbia Journalism Review ·Elon Musk says New York’s ballot is a scam. It’s actually a 19th-century voting tradition.
News Poynter ·Fact check: Trump revives his false claim that Americans have to show ID to buy groceries
News edition.cnn.com ·Trump misleads on deportations and inflation in first ‘60 Minutes’ interview since 2020
News Poynter ·Myths and facts about SNAP
News Media Matters for America ·Competing Claims on Who Benefits from ACA Subsidies
News FactCheck.org ·Trump keeps teasing a third term. The Constitution says no.
News Poynter ·Reagan’s Words on Tariffs
News FactCheck.org ·in brief
Fact checking: not a tool for all seasons
It was love at first sight, but over time, my ardor has cooled. I still believe there is value in cataloging misstatements, exaggerations, and, well, lies. But when government policies are undertaken and justified by nothing more than a fever-dream of fantasy and fiction, fact checking doesn’t meet the moment.
Sept. 27, 2024