The UK’s fact-checkers are sending their AI to help Americans cover elections
Inside a modest office near London Bridge, a small team of engineers and fact-checkers has spent a decade refining AI tools and models to do what most journalists can no longer manage: keep up. The system reads headlines, transcribes broadcasts and scans social media for claims worth verifying. It flags those most likely to mislead or cause harm.
The technology, developed by Full Fact, the United Kingdom’s leading fact-checking charity, is crossing the Atlantic. Ahead of the 2026 U.S. midterm elections, which many misinformation experts expect to be defined by AI-created falsehoods, Full Fact is offering its tools to American newsrooms to help track harmful misinformation at scale.
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property
Related Knowledge Center: Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.