A War of Attrition
Theodore Boutrous on taking the White House and Pentagon press access cases.
On September 18, Theodore Boutrous Jr., a prominent appellate and media lawyer, was preparing to take a vacation. Boutrous, a partner at the firm of Gibson Dunn, had been busy representing the New York Times in its lawsuit over access to the Pentagon. Now his phone rang: David Vigilante, the head of legal for CNN, needed to talk. Via Truth Social diktat, Donald Trump had just banished CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House. In minutes, Boutrous mapped out the structure of a complaint. “It was just a matter of expanding it, fleshing it out and getting all the evidence together,” he told me.
Related stories
Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press
Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.
Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest
The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.
The White House vs. the press | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Media and the law
Toxic politics and vast shifts in the technology landscape have created a plethora of thorny issues — both legal and ethical — for newsrooms, courts, and regulators.
The Meta-FTC trial | Section 230