Section 230
Legislation enacted in 1996 protected interactive computer services from liability for third-party content — and defenders and critics of the law have been debating it ever since.
The Latest
The Open Social Web Needs Section 230 To Survive
News commentary Techdirt ·Transcript: Senate Commerce Hearing on 30 Years of Section 230
News Tech Policy Press ·Congress considers blowing up internet law
News commentary The Verge ·Section 230 turns 30 as it faces its biggest tests yet
News The Verge ·A New Section 230: Why AI Preemption Would Let Tech Off the Hook Again
News commentary Tech Policy Press ·Otherwise Objectionable: Will Section 230 Survive?
News commentary Techdirt ·Otherwise Objectionable: Can Section 230 Survive In An AI-Driven World?
News commentary Techdirt ·Section 230 Is Under Attack (Again)
News Columbia Journalism Review ·How Democrats’ Attack On Section 230 Plays Right Into Trump’s Censorial Plans
News commentary Techdirt ·Section 230 May Finally Get Changed as Lawmakers Prep New Bill
News The Information ·Otherwise Objectionable: The Internet Before Section 230
News commentary Techdirt ·My New Podcast ‘Otherwise Objectionable’ Explains Why Everyone’s Wrong About Section 230
News Techdirt ·Katie Couric Is Wrong: Repealing Section 230 Won’t Stop Online Misinformation
News commentary Techdirt ·ExTwitter’s New Lawsuit Accurately Argues California Deepfake Law Violates First Amendment, Section 230
News commentary Techdirt ·Trump's pick to run the FCC has told us what he plans: TikTok ban, space broadband, and Section 230 reform
News The Register ·No, Section 230 Doesn’t ‘Circumvent’ The First Amendment – But This Harvard Article Circumvents Reality
News Techdirt ·What does it mean to ‘publish’ in the age of Section 230? Plus, Olivia Nuzzi update, and media notes
News commentary Media Nation ·Resources
Section 230: an overview
Congressional Research Service
Since its passage, federal courts have interpreted Section 230 as creating expansive immunity for claims based on third-party content that appears online. Consequently, internet companies and users frequently rely on Section 230’s protections to avoid liability in federal and state litigation. But in recent years, commentators and jurists have expressed concern that the broad immunity courts have recognized under Section 230 is beyond the law’s intended scope.
Jan. 4, 2024
Liability for Content Hosts: An Overview of the Communication Decency Act’s Section 230
Congressional Research Service
Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, enacted as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA), broadly protects online service providers like social media companies from being held liable for transmitting or taking down user-generated content. In part because of this broad immunity, social media platforms and other online content hosts have largely operated without outside regulation, resulting in a mostly self-policing industry. However, while the immunity created by Section 230 is significant, it is not absolute.
June 6, 2019
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (S 652, PL 104-104)
Congress.gov
An act to promote competition and reduce regulation in order to secure lower prices and higher quality services for American telecommunications consumers and encourage the rapid deployment of new telecommunications technologies.
Enacted Feb. 8, 1996