Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
The Latest
On International Fact-Checking Day, PolitiFact explains the truth in Trump’s tariffs agenda
News Poynter ·Fact-checkers face intimidation in Eastern Europe as USAID cuts embolden authoritarian tactics
News Poynter ·Anonymous X account shares falsehoods to Elon Musk, top US officials. What we know about ‘Amuse.’
News Poynter ·NOAA firings came just before a US tornado outbreak. Did public warning systems still work?
News Poynter ·Legacy media fail to fact check Trump’s ‘border czar’ on sex trafficking
News contrarian.substack.com ·Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says measles infection may have benefits, but there’s no conclusive evidence
News Poynter ·Whoopi Goldberg didn’t get ‘The View’ a $6 million federal grant. That claim originated as satire.
News Poynter ·White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says tariffs are ‘a tax cut.’ Economists say they aren’t
News Poynter ·Just the facts? Meta’s new experiment says otherwise
News Poynter ·Audio of a BBC reporter making a snide comment about the Trump-Zelenskyy meeting is fake
News Poynter ·How Trump’s cuts are crippling journalism beyond the United States
News Nieman Lab ·No, USAID didn’t ‘subsidize’ CNN and MSNBC hosts’ salaries
News Poynter ·in brief
Fact checking: not a tool for all seasons
It was love at first sight, but over time, my ardor has cooled. I still believe there is value in cataloging misstatements, exaggerations, and, well, lies. But when government policies are undertaken and justified by nothing more than a fever-dream of fantasy and fiction, fact checking doesn’t meet the moment.
Sept. 27, 2024