New York Times Alleges Trump Administration’s Reverse Discrimination Lawsuit Was Retaliation For Its Reporting On EEOC
The New York Times filed a counterclaim to a lawsuit brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, alleging that the litigation was a retaliatory effort because of its reporting on the Trump administration.
In a filing in federal court in Manhattan, the Times’ legal team wrote, “The Commission filed this action only eight days after The Times published an article reporting that the EEOC is under pressure to use its scarce resources to pursue flimsy (at best) claims of alleged discrimination that ‘fit the Trump administration’s priorities,’ and a mere two days after The Times reported that it was being investigated by the EEOC.”
In May, the EEOC filed a reverse discrimination lawsuit against the Times, alleging that it violated federal law when it passed up a white male employee for a promotion because of his race or sex.
But in its filing, the Times’ legal team wrote that the person chosen for the role as deputy real estate editor was more qualified than the person who was passed up for the job, Bryant Roussau. The Times’ team wrote that she had extensive experience with service journalism and “articulated a compelling vision for the future of The Times’s real estate coverage that aligned with the Real Estate desk’s goals to focus on service and visually-driven journalism.” The Times also noted that other candidates of color of both sexes had more real estate experience than Rousseau yet were not advanced in the hiring process.
“Despite conducting an eight-month investigation, collecting more than a thousand pages of documents, and interviewing no fewer than nine witnesses, the Commission was unable to identify any evidence that The Times considered the selected candidate’s race or sex in filling the position,” the Times stated in its filing.
The counterclaim also identifies numerous instances in which Trump has attacked the Times, noting that he has, among other things, called it “treasonous.”
“The Commission’s retaliatory, bad faith use of its authority to target The Times violates the First and Fifth Amendments and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and poses a uniquely insidious threat to a free and independent press, and to our democracy,” according to the filing.
The counterclaim alleges violation of the First Amendment, due process and the Administrative Procedure Act. It seeks dismissal of the EEOC claim and a declaration that the lawsuit was a violation of the First and Fifth Amendment, as well as the APA. It also seeks costs and attorney’s fees.
An EEOC spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press
Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.
Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest
The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.
The White House vs. the press | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Media and the law
Toxic politics and vast shifts in the technology landscape have created a plethora of thorny issues — both legal and ethical — for newsrooms, courts, and regulators.
The Meta-FTC trial | Section 230