Free Speech Standards and Social Media Age Restrictions in Australia and the US
On Wednesday, Australia’s “world-first” social media minimum age provisions took effect, requiring designated platforms to take “reasonable steps” to prevent children under 16 from holding accounts. According to the Australian eSafety Commissioner, the platforms currently affected include Facebook, Instagram, Kick, Reddit, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X and YouTube. In parallel, the Commissioner has registered industry codes requiring a broader range of online service providers, including search engines, to implement steps, including in some cases appropriate “age assurance” measures to prevent children’s accounts from accessing certain adult and harmful content.
Several US states have passed child e-safety laws. Although generally narrower in scope than Australia’s national scheme, many of those laws failed constitutional scrutiny because they restricted adults’ speech. However, in July 2025, the US Supreme Court upheld a Texas law requiring adult content providers to verify users’ ages, finding that it only incidentally burdened the speech of adults.
Related stories
Related Knowledge Center: Social media
Social media platforms are the source of news for millions of people — and they have a fraught and ever-shifting relationship with the enterprises that provide that news.
The TikTok ban | The Meta-FTC trial
Related Knowledge Center: Media and the law
Toxic politics and vast shifts in the technology landscape have created a plethora of thorny issues — both legal and ethical — for newsrooms, courts, and regulators.
The Meta-FTC trial | Section 230