Woodside Investors Vote Down Climate Strategy but Reelects Chair - Rigzone News
Woodside Investors Vote Down Climate Strategy but Reelects Chair | Rigzone
Woodside Investors Vote Down Climate Strategy but Reelects Chair
The majority of shareholders of Woodside Energy Group Ltd. have voted against the Australian liquefied natural gas producer's climate strategy but decided to retain chair Richard Goyder on the board.
Days before the annual meeting of investors this week, Woodside investor HESTA called out Woodside’s emission reduction plans, saying these fall short of the Paris Agreement on global warming and calling for the installment of new directors with the appropriate climate expertise.
On February 27, Perth-based Woodside released its Climate Transition Action Plan (CTAP), setting for the first time a goal for Scope 3, or emissions from the use of its products. Its emissions neutrality policy previously only accounted for Scope 1 and 2, broadly defined as emissions from operations and input energy respectively.
“Woodside has set a complementary Scope 3 emissions abatement target, to indicate the potential abatement impact of these products and services upon customer Scope 1 or 2 emissions”, Woodside said at the time. “This target is to take final investment decisions on new energy products and lower carbon services by 2030, with total abatement capacity of 5 Mtpa CO2e [million tons per annum of carbon dioxide equivalent]”.
Woodside said then it has spent over $335 million toward its $5 billion investment target in “new energy products and lower carbon services” by 2030. Woodside categorizes this investment as part of emission reduction efforts.
In a report February 12, the Australian Conservation Foundation said the $5 billion investment still involves fossil fuels. The foundation also called on Woodside to set a Scope 3 climate roadmap.
This week stockholders who cast their vote rejected the CTAP, 58.36 percent versus 41.64 percent, according to results published by Woodside.
In a letter to shareholders ahead of the meeting, Goyder said, “We are concerned that some stakeholders’ and investors’ requests to drastically change Woodside’s strategy and investment priorities risk eroding value for all shareholders and contributing to a disorderly energy transition”.
“The energy transition will take time and significant investment, and I am confident that Woodside’s disciplined approach is the right path for our shareholders”, stated the letter, shared on Woodside’s website.
“Regardless of the outcome of the advisory vote on our CTAP, Woodside will continue to seek investor feedback and continually evolve our climate change strategy with the goal of enabling Woodside to thrive through the energy transition”.
Goyder, as well as chief executive Meg O’Neill, spoke before the voting insisting on maintaining Woodside’s net zero policy of accounting only for scope 1 and 2 equity emissions.
In the HESTA statement ahead of the meeting, HESTA chief executive Debby Blakey said “there remains a significant gap between the current plan and a 1.5C transition pathway”.
While calling for the addition of “appropriately skilled directors to catalyze the technological and cultural change required to prepare the business for the energy transition”, HESTA said it was supporting Goyder.
“This decision reflects the constructive nature of ongoing engagement and our belief that there continues to be positive progress towards adding additional Board skills”, it said of its decision to vote for Goyder.
Goyder was re-elected at the meeting, 83.4 percent against 16.6 percent.
To contact the author, email jov.onsat@rigzone.com
What do you think? We’d love to hear from you, join the conversation on the Rigzone Energy Network.
The Rigzone Energy Network is a new social experience created for you and all energy professionals to Speak Up about our industry, share knowledge, connect with peers and industry insiders and engage in a professional community that will empower your career in energy.
- USA Upstream Merger Activity Gets Off to Record Start
- Nigeria Puts Two Fields into Production
- Xeneta Flags Climate Effect of Red Sea Conflict
- Canada Gas Firm Bags Venezuela Contracts but Stumbles on US Sanctions
- Refinery Fires Upend Mexico Plan to Curb Oil Exports
- USA Crude Oil Stocks Drop More Than 6MM Barrels WoW
- European Gas Traders Are Already Worrying About Next Winter
- Var Energi Posts Record Production
- Saipem Reports Higher Figures for Q1
- Equinor Posts Solid Results on Strong Production
- Dryad Says Reports Indicate Iran Intends to Disrupt Strait of Hormuz
- Galp Announces 10B Barrel Hydrocarbon in Place Estimate at Namibia Prospect
- JPMorgan, S&P, Rystad Share Views on Oil and Middle East Situation
- UK Oil Regulator Fines NEO Energy
- Can Oil, Gas Companies Use Generative AI to Help Hire People?
- Biden Limits Oil Drilling Across Alaska's Petroleum Reserve
- South Korea Puts into Service New Oil and Gas Import Terminal
- Are Cyber Attacks a Growing Threat to Oil and Gas Vessels?
- Investors Ask Chevron to Issue Tax Transparency Report
- Rystad Looks at USA Reimposition of Venezuela Oil Sanctions
- An Already Bad Situation in the Red Sea Just Got Worse
- Oil and Gas Executives Predict WTI Oil Price
- Oil and Gas Execs Reveal Where They See Henry Hub Price Heading
- Macquarie Strategists Warn of Large Oil Price Correction
- Chevron, Hess Confident Embattled Merger Will Close Mid-2024
- Analysts Flag 'Remarkable Feature' of 2024 Oil Price Rally
- One Dead in PEMEX Platform Fire
- Brand Finance Ranks Most Valuable, Strongest Oil and Gas Brands
- US to Shell Out $4B in First Round of Advanced Energy Tax Credit
- 88 Energy Confirms Light Oil Discovery in Alaska Asset
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”