News

Washington’s Pegasus Spyware Problem

Tech Policy Press · David Hatami · last updated

I grew up on Long Island in the years after September 11, 2001, when being Muslim meant living under quiet scrutiny. The New York Police Department’s “Demographics Unit,” built with help from the CIA, reportedly sent plain-clothes officers and informants to mosques, cafés, student groups and grocery stores across the region. They mapped Muslim communities, tracking daily life without evidence of crime. Years later, internal reviews showed that the program produced no terrorism leads. What it did produce was fear and the notion that proximity to faith was enough to justify surveillance.

That era taught many of us that once technology and suspicion are linked, they rarely separate. Two decades later, the same logic has been exported globally through tools like Pegasus, the zero-click spyware developed by Israel’s NSO Group. Pegasus has been used by governments across the globe to monitor activists, journalists and political dissidents. This fall, in a quiet transaction worth tens of millions of dollars, a private group of American investors acquired NSO.

At first glance, the sale appears to be just another niche transaction in the cybersecurity sector. But NSO does not sell ordinary software; it sells extreme access. The group develops spyware capable of remotely infiltrating a phone and installing software that grants complete access to the target’s messages, camera and microphone.

Related Knowledge Center: Digital privacy and data security

State of Play

If you’re online, you’re generating a constant stream of information about yourself — sometimes voluntarily, sometimes unwittingly — that is assembled and used to craft your online experience. And generate wealth for data brokers. Meanwhile, designers and managers of the digital infrastructure on which the world depends are engaged in a never-ending effort to thwart attempts, by both criminal enterprises and state actors, to exploit vulnerabilities in those systems.   

Signalgate | State surveillance


More informationabout Digital privacy and data security

Related Knowledge Center: State surveillance

State of Play

While government monitoring of personal digital communications has traditionally been associated with authoritarian regimes such as China, the Trump regime has moved to use citizens’ personal information in unprecedented ways.

Digital privacy and data security | FISA — Section 702


More informationabout State surveillance