News

Was the FBI Raid on a Washington Post Reporter’s Home an Act of Retribution?

Columbia Journalism Review · Jem Bartholomew · last updated

Investigators “assisted” Hannah Natanson in applying her right index finger to a Post-owned MacBook Pro, accessing all its data.

In 2022, Kash Patel, now the director of the FBI, published The Plot Against the King, the first in his series of illustrated children’s books. In The Plot and its two sequels, which draw on the stolen-2020-election conspiracy theory and the Trump-Russia probe, Patel appears as a wizard in a pointy blue hat (“Kash the Distinguished Discoverer”) who helps “King Donald” battle a series of foes who seek to usurp his throne. These include “Hillary Queenton,” “Baron Von Biden,” “Comma-la-la-la,” and “the heralds,” Patel’s name for the press, who spread rumors and lies about King Donald being a cheater. The heralds hold trumpets labeled “NYT,” “CNN,” and “The Post.” “Don’t just trust the person with the loudest trumpet,” Patel urges readers at one point.

It’s easy to laugh at Patel’s books, which are marketed as “a fantastical retelling of the terrible true story.” But they also capture something of the Trump administration’s alarming desire for retribution, which Patel is intent on weaponizing the FBI to achieve. Patel, who is forty-six, rose rapidly through the ranks during Donald Trump’s first term in a variety of national security roles, distinguished less by his competence than by his unswerving loyalty to the president. As he said on Steve Bannon’s War Room podcast in 2023, “We’re gonna come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections. We’re gonna come after you—whether it’s criminally or civilly, we’ll figure that out—but yeah, we’re putting you all on notice.”

Related stories

Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press

State of Play

Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.

Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America


More informationabout The White House vs. the press

Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest

State of Play

The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.

The White House vs. the press  |  Voiceless America 


More informationabout Free speech and public protest

Related Knowledge Center: Media and the law

State of Play

Toxic politics and vast shifts in the technology landscape have created a plethora of thorny issues — both legal and ethical — for newsrooms, courts, and regulators.

The Meta-FTC trial | Section 230


More informationabout Media and the law