Vitol, power trader to pay $2.3M to settle CAISO-related market manipulation charges
Vitol, power trader to pay $2.3M to settle CAISO-related market manipulation charges | Utility Dive
Vitol Inc. and one of the company’s traders will pay $2.3 million to settle allegations they manipulated the California Independent System Operator’s power market under an agreement approved Thursday by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
FERC enforcement office staff contend that Vitol and Federico Corteggiano, a Vitol power trader, sold physical power at a loss in CAISO’s day-ahead market in a one-week period in 2013 to eliminate congestion costs they expected would lead to losses on Vitol’s congestion revenue rights. Vitol and Corteggiano deny the allegations.
In 2019, FERC agreed with its staff and assessed civil penalties of $1.5 million for the Houston-based company and $1 million for the trader. The agency also ordered Vitol to disgorge $1.2 million in unjust profits. At the time, FERC staff recommended Vitol pay $6 million and Corteggiano pay $800,000.
FERC in early 2020 asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California to affirm its penalty order.
Under the agreement resolving the dispute, Vitol will pay $2.225 million and Corteggiano will pay $75,000.
Vitol Inc. is part of the Vitol global commodities trading holding company based in Geneva, Switzerland.
In fiscal year 2023, FERC approved 12 enforcement office settlement agreements totaling about $48.8 million compared with 11 approved agreements totaling $57.5 million in FY22, according to the agency’s most recent enforcement report.
In the report, FERC said market manipulation and fraud cause losses that are passed on to consumers, undermining the agency’s goal of ensuring efficient energy services at a reasonable cost.
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”