US freezes foreign aid, halting cybersecurity defense and policy funds for allies
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has frozen nearly all foreign aid cash for a full-on government review, including funds to defend America’s allies from cyberattacks as well as steer international computer security policies.
The pause applies to “all US foreign assistance funded by or through the State Department and US Agency for International Development” while these programs undergo a probe to “ensure they are efficient and consistent with US foreign policy under the America First agenda,” according to State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce.
Realigning foreign assistance on behalf of hardworking taxpayers is not just the right thing to do, it is a moral imperative
“President Trump stated clearly that the United States is no longer going to blindly dole out money with no return for the American people,” Bruce said in a Sunday statement.
“Reviewing and realigning foreign assistance on behalf of hardworking taxpayers is not just the right thing to do, it is a moral imperative,” she continued. “The Secretary is proud to protect America’s investment with a deliberate and judicious review of how we spend foreign assistance dollars overseas.”
The directive follows President Donald Trump’s executive order issued last week that, among a ton of other cuts to Biden-era programs, paused foreign aid for 90 days pending reviews “for programmatic efficiency and consistency” with US policy.
This includes State Department money funneled to the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP), according to The Record, citing “two people familiar with the matter.”
CDP is an agency within the State Department, which was formed under the Biden administration in April 2022 and tasked with negotiating international cybersecurity policies and working with allies to improve privacy protections and responses to digital threats.
This work has previously included funneling millions of dollars to Costa Rica and Albania following cyberattacks on those two nations’ governments; the money was intended to be spent on shoring up those countries’ IT defenses.
The State Department did not immediately respond to The Register’s inquiries, including which cyber-related programs and funding have been halted, and how this move supports homeland security, which increasingly involves strong digital defenses around the globe.
Also over the weekend, the Senate confirmed former South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem to lead the US Department of Homeland Security by a 59-34 vote. During her confirmation hearing, Noem indicated she would make cuts to America’s top cybersecurity agency.
Homeland Security oversees the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, aka CISA, and both Noem and Trump have taken issue with CISA’s efforts to combat misinformation online — especially as it relates to foreign trolls trying to influence US elections.
“CISA’s gotten far off mission,” Noem, a Republican, said during questioning by senators. “They’re using their resources in ways that was never intended. The misinformation and disinformation that they have stuck their toe into and meddled with should be refocused back onto what their job is.” ®
Do you know more about what’s happening inside the US government following the President’s latest orders? Let us know in confidence.
Related Knowledge Center: Digital privacy and data security
If you’re online, you’re generating a constant stream of information about yourself — sometimes voluntarily, sometimes unwittingly — that is assembled and used to craft your online experience. And generate wealth for data brokers. Meanwhile, designers and managers of the digital infrastructure on which the world depends are engaged in a never-ending effort to thwart attempts, by both criminal enterprises and state actors, to exploit vulnerabilities in those systems.
Signalgate | State surveillance
Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity
In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug.
Fact-checking and its detractors