Study Guide Supremacy
If you spend any time among people in the AI space, you’ll hear a common refrain. Large language models (LLMs) like Google’s Gemini, Anthropic’s Claude, and OpenAI’s ChatGPT are handy tools for searching the internet, separating facts from the chaff, and delivering information objectively. Of course, we’ve already invented a system for dispatching neutral information, and that system is called journalism. Herein lies a serious irony. Many LLMs are trained on content produced by journalistic institutions, but do not adhere to journalistic standards when rehashing the material. An LLM might regurgitate verbatim text from the New York Times without proper citation, or combine the work of real reporters with hallucinated quotes and misleading language. That poses not only a research problem but a major existential threat to news outlets, whose financial health depends, at least in part, on ad revenue from Web traffic. LLMs divert attention from news websites, while profiting from their archives and years of newsroom labor, and, in most cases, do not pay them a dime.
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property
Related Knowledge Center: State of the business model
The traditional journalism business model has long since collapsed, and news organizations have shrunk or disappeared entirely. While a number of promising experiments are under way, the public has not shown a willingness to buy what news organizations are selling.
Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom
As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies — they are deploying an array of editorial responses.
The Times and its critics | Washington Post mortem