Signal Markers
The Trump administration has tried to subdue us with a “shock and awe” approach that has been deliberately designed to overwhelm our senses with an endless stream of outrages and divide our reaction to its intentional cruelties, but every now and then an outrage manages to poke its head above the crowd and get our undivided attention
That certainly seems to be the case with this morning’s revelation from Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, that he was somehow looped into a group text on Signal in which high-ranking officials in the Trump White House delivered the details of an impending military action.
Related Knowledge Center: Digital privacy and data security
If you’re online, you’re generating a constant stream of information about yourself — sometimes voluntarily, sometimes unwittingly — that is assembled and used to craft your online experience. And generate wealth for data brokers. Meanwhile, designers and managers of the digital infrastructure on which the world depends are engaged in a never-ending effort to thwart attempts, by both criminal enterprises and state actors, to exploit vulnerabilities in those systems.
Signalgate | State surveillance
Related Knowledge Center: Signalgate
The inadvertent inclusion of the Atlantic editor on a Signal group chat sharing information about a pending U.S. military strike has created an uproar of accusations and denials. It’s also exposed a Pandora’s box of shoddy digital security practices within the Trump administration
The White House vs. the press | Digital privacy and data security