Reporting on child welfare requires digging past surface-level stories
LOUISVILLE — When I began reporting on child welfare, I brought with me the baggage that plagues all humans: misconceptions and blind spots about a system that I had never lived through.
I had been covering health, which for me always included children’s well-being and family issues, for nearly five years. So I knew a few things for certain.
Kentucky, the state where I was born, raised and educated, has a rampant child abuse and neglect problem that’s left thousands of children in out-of-home placements. Some children who can’t find placement sleep in office buildings; others go to kinship care families who, thanks to a dispute between the executive and legislative branches of government, aren’t getting the financial assistance they need.
But, because of privacy issues and other factors, I had never been quite able to peek around the metaphorical curtain and see the inner workings of the child welfare system in the commonwealth. I was left with gaps about the complexities and bureaucracies in the system, too often covering the system as it is and not as it could (and perhaps should) be.
Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom
As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies — they are deploying an array of editorial responses.
The Times and its critics | Washington Post mortem