News

The Press Leaves the Pentagon

Columbia Journalism Review · Aida Alami · last updated

In 1971, the Supreme Court ruled that the New York Times and the Washington Post had the right, under the First Amendment, to publish classified documents exposing serious deceptions by the government during the Vietnam War—revelations that came to be known as the Pentagon Papers. The landmark decision prevented the government from preemptively censoring the press. Last week, however, a new media policy took effect at the Pentagon. It requires reporters to sign a pledge agreeing only to use material that is “approved for public release by an appropriate authorizing official, even if it is unclassified.” Journalists who refused to fall in line lost their passes.

“It’s like college move-out day,” one reporter told Ivan L. Nagy, who covered the Pentagon’s new policy in a series of articles for CJR, referring to dozens of veteran correspondents packing their desks and leaving the building. Nearly every major media outlet, including Fox News, issued a statement about why they refused to comply. “Securing access to the Pentagon, to the building, is not worth giving up the ability to write more than press releases and official statements,” one editor told Nagy.

Just three US outlets and a handful of independent reporters signed the pledge. Those outlets were One America News, The Federalist, and the Epoch Times, where one national security reporter, Andrew Thornebrooke, resigned in protest. Thornebrooke wrote in his resignation email that signing the pledge was a choice to “abdicate our responsibility as journalists in favor of merely repeating state narratives.” 

Related stories

Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press

State of Play

Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.

Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America


More informationabout The White House vs. the press

Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest

State of Play

The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.

The White House vs. the press  |  Voiceless America 


More informationabout Free speech and public protest

Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics

State of Play

News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.

The White House vs. the press


More informationabout Democracy and politics