Poll: Voters support company neutrality when workers unionize

A recent poll finds that voters in Virginia and around the country view unionization efforts as widely beneficial to workers — and are more supportive of clean energy projects that have strong labor practices.

The survey by the nonprofits Data for Progress and BlueGreen Alliance shows more than 60% of respondents support companies taking a neutral stance if their employees decide whether to form a union.

A similar percentage also say employers should be encouraged to sign a neutrality agreement.

Danielle Deiseroth, executive director of Data for Progress, said the poll found most people believe unions improve the workplace.

“So our polling found that there was a pretty broad consensus in general that unionization helps workers secure better benefits,” said Deiseroth, “such as better health insurance and more paid time off, improved wages, improved worker safety.”

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are more than 200,000 union members in the Commonwealth.

For the first time, unionization rates in clean energy surpassed rates in the broader energy sector.

Respondents also said they are more likely to support climate infrastructure projects if a private company commits to strong labor practices. Deiseroth said that makes sense.

“From our polling, we see that, unsurprisingly, voters are very supportive of that,” said Deiseroth. “Voters want to see their taxpayer dollars going to support good job creation in the country that applies significantly to the clean energy sector.”

The Commonwealth is home to numerous major clean energy projects. That includes Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind, which is the largest offshore wind project in the U.S.

Local leaders in California are slamming the Trump administration’s moves to gut dozens of environmental policies on climate change and pollution in low-income communities.

Last week Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin said the agency will loosen restrictions on oil and gas and reconsider the “endangerment finding” underpinning regulations on greenhouse gases.

Felipe Perez, city council member and former mayor of Firebaugh, said farmworkers in the Central Valley rely on the feds to limit air pollution from nearby oil rigs.

“The people that work in the field, we have to go to work even though the pollution is too high,” Perez pointed out. “We have to go because we have to feed our families.”

The EPA also eliminated the department that fights for environmental justice and killed the Biden-era Justice40 plan, which directed 40% of infrastructure money to low-income communities of color.

Daniel Ramos, mayor pro tem of Adelanto in San Bernardino County, said the Trump administration has frozen millions of dollars earmarked by Congress for improvements to the city’s wastewater treatment facility.

“Stripping away funding and programs that have already been signed into law, counted on and, in our case awarded, will definitely have a detrimental impact on those Justice 40 communities,” Ramos stressed.

Igor Tregub, a city council member in Berkeley who was born in Ukraine, said the move to lift rules promoting electric vehicles increases reliance on oil and gas, which he called a threat to national and international security.

“This is a boost to the kinds of fossil-fuel industries that fund authoritarian forces like Putin’s, that have a desire to take over peaceful democracies like Ukraine,” Tregub noted.

Zeldin defended the moves, insisting they will “usher in a golden age of American success” and calling former President Joe Biden’s environmental policy a “green new scam.”

As the warming climate continues to reshape the environment, its impact on people’s health is becoming increasingly evident in Florida. Doctors and other health experts are sounding the alarm, emphasizing the need for action to address the intersection of climate change and public health.

Dr. Farhan Malik, a pediatric intensive-care unit doctor at Florida’s Nemours Children’s Hospital, highlighted the broad and often underestimated health risks tied to climate change, explaining how environmental changes are affecting vulnerable populations, especially children.

“I think everything that you could possibly encounter from a health perspective, we don’t attribute enough to climate,” he said. “From my realm, in the pediatric world, a lot of these kids are affected by infectious diseases, they’ve got weak immune systems, they’ve got immature lungs.”

Malik pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of how environmental changes, from deforestation to rising temperatures, force animals into new habitats, increasing the risk of zoonotic diseases and global health crises.

Dr. Cheryl Holder, a primary-care physician who co-founded and heads Florida Clinicians for Climate Action, echoed those concerns, particularly the impact of heat on those at greater risk for heat-related illnesses.

“And especially heat, which is the number one weather-related killer,” she said. “How do we get folks to be prepared and protected for the heat? Central Florida has a large amount of areas that we call ‘heat islands’ because they don’t have as much shade, a lot of concrete — and lower-wealth communities, they can be 10 degrees higher.”

She said many people don’t realize how severe heat stroke can be, stressing that calling 911 should be the first step before attempting to cool the body down.

The need for greater public awareness and action was among the topics at this week’s Climate Correction Conference in Orlando.

As federal funding for climate initiatives faces steep cuts, nonprofits and philanthropic organizations are stepping into the breach, calling out the urgent need for private support to address what they see as an existential crisis.

The issue took center stage Wednesday in Orlando, at the Climate Correction Conference. With federal grants paused or canceled due to recent executive orders and legal challenges, nonprofits grapple with uncertainty, making private philanthropy more critical than ever.

Dawn Shirreffs, Florida director of the Environmental Defense Fund, explained the urgency.

“We don’t have time,” Shirreffs emphasized. “In fact, one of the things Environmental Defense Fund is known for is we don’t have an endowment, because we don’t feel we have the time to wait in the battle on climate change to have money sitting in a bank. We need to get our greenhouse gas emissions down now, so that we have a planet to fight for.”

Shirreffs argued it is time to rethink philanthropic giving. She stressed there is a critical need for strategic, multiyear funding rather than one-time donations to sustain climate efforts.

David S. Vogel, cofounder, trustee and chief scientist for the VoLo Foundation, which is hosting the conference, said as a data-driven funder, he prioritizes long-term investments in climate solutions, from sustainable farming to clean energy innovation. He echoed the call for proactive philanthropy in light of federal funding cuts.

“Cuts all across the board — not just climate science, cancer research — again, the government falling short on thinking proactively. It’s very reactive,” Vogel contended. “As a result, maybe the government will end up having to pay more in climate damages. But it’s more important than ever for private funding to step in and fund at least the right areas of research.”

Yoca Arditti-Rocha, executive director of the CLEO Institute, highlighted the disproportionate impact of climate change on Florida, from rising sea levels and stronger hurricanes to an insurance crisis, all while receiving minimal funding for solutions.

“It’s important to understand that only 2% of global philanthropy dollars go to climate solutions,” Arditti-Rocha pointed out. “We cannot solve this issue with just 2%. We must close that funding gap.”

The panelists agreed the climate crisis is a threat multiplier, exacerbating issues like poverty, public health and housing. They said philanthropy must step up to fill the void being left by government cuts.