News

PG&E CEO Set to Make Last-Ditch Pitch to Bury Power Lines - Yahoo Finance

Yahoo Finance · last updated

PG&E CEO Set to Make Last-Ditch Pitch to Bury Power Lines

(Bloomberg) -- PG&E Corp. Chief Executive Officer Patti Poppe is making a last-ditch effort to convince California to sign off on the utility’s $5.9 billion plan to put power lines underground to prevent wildfires.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Israel Latest: Iranian Minister Warns US Over Support of Israel
House Speaker Mike Johnson’s First Big Bill Cuts Biden’s Climate Change Funding
S&P 500 Extends Slide From Its July Peak to 10%: Markets Wrap
Everything Apple Plans to Launch at Oct. 30 ‘Scary Fast’ Mac Event

Poppe is scheduled to discuss the plan Friday with state regulators who have pushed back with their own proposal they say is cheaper and faster for Californians, who already face some of the highest power rates in the country.

“It’s a no-brainer,” Poppe said in an interview with Bloomberg. “We need to bury these lines.”

PG&E proposes to bury 2,000 miles of electrical wire over four years in high fire-threat areas. State regulators instead put forward plans to reduce the number by at least half, with the remaining overhead wires being covered by a protective material.

Choosing between covering conductors and burying lines is a “sucker’s choice” because the utility is doing both, Poppe said. And while the cost to bury the lines is considerable, doing so will benefit customers in the long run by saving PG&E from having to continually trim back trees and repair fallen overhead wires, Poppe said.

Read More: PG&E to Pay $45 Million for Second-Largest California Fire

The five-member California Public Utilities Commission is scheduled to vote on the plan next week as part of PG&E’s general rate proposal to increase revenue collected from customers by 26% for 2023, with smaller increases through 2026. Regulators have countered with proposals that would allow for as much as a 13% increase. PG&E says its plan would result in an annual compounded rate increase of 3% over four years.

“My feedback to the commission is that this is affordable. And I’m not just talking about undergrounding, I’m talking about the whole general rate case,” Poppe said.

During its third-quarter earnings call Thursday, PG&E executives said the state’s recommendations would restrict cash flow and jeopardize the company’s efforts to restore its credit metrics to investment grade. The utility has been working toward restoring its credit ratings since it was forced to file bankruptcy four years ago after sparking some of the worst wildfires in California history.

“California does need to attract investment for this very essential infrastructure to deliver the clean energy of the future that California’s standing for,” Poppe said.

PG&E shares rose 1.4% to $16.10 at 10:09 a.m. in New York. The stock is down over 1% year-to-date.

(Adds shares in 10th paragraph)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

Sam Bankman-Fried Takes Stand in Reminder of Crypto’s Epic Fall
X, One Year Later: How Elon Musk Made a Mess of Twitter’s Business
Venezuela’s Primary Sweep Puts Maduro and Biden in the Hot Seat
A Complicated Billionaire Shoots for the Moon on The Businessweek Show
China Premier Li Keqiang: ‘Economic Openness Serves Everyone Better’

©2023 Bloomberg L.P.

Related Knowledge Center: ENERGY BASICS: nuclear

State of Play

Nuclear energy provides almost 20 percent of the U.S. electricity supply. Advocates have called for an expanded role for nuclear as an emissions-free fuel source. But the economics of building new reactors are daunting. In addition, lingering safety concerns are an institutionalized part of the calculation of nuclear regulation, and highly radioactive nuclear waste remains a can that public officials have been inclined to kick down the road. The Energy Information Administration projects a sharp decline in nuclear power generation over the next decade, as new nuclear plants — two are planned — are more than offset by anticipated retirements of several operating reactors.

More informationabout ENERGY BASICS: nuclear