News commentary

The Pentagon’s New ‘Press Corps’ Is an Utter Embarrassment — And It Won’t Help Hegseth

mediaite.com · last updated

The Pentagon’s press briefing room played host to a surreal scene this week as MAGA influencers, ranging from Pizzagate conspiracy theorist Jack Posobiec to former Republican congressman Matt Gaetz to Laura Loomer, took over the role of actual journalists trying to cover and hold accountable the largest and most consequential department in the U.S. government.

While there very well may be some well-intentioned citizen journalists in the new “press corps,” it’s undeniable that, on the whole, the one thing they have in common is loyalty to MAGA and President Donald Trump. Gaetz, of course, was appointed by Trump to be attorney general, a job Trump explicitly views as being his lawyer – a toady meant to run cover for him first and foremost. Remember what happened to Jeff Sessions?

Loomer, Posobiec, and so many others make their livings entirely off of keeping a pro-Trump audience happy and are financially incentivized to toe the line, attack the left, and never spark the ire of Trump or their viewers.

Trump had already broken with a long tradition of keeping the Pentagon apolitical by appointing a former Fox News weekend morning show host and longtime culture war warrior, Pete Hegseth, as defense secretary – a job he has now retitled secretary of war. During Trump’s first term, his defense secretaries were venerable national security figures with decades of experience who had actually worked inside the Pentagon and were widely seen as nonpartisan. They also happened to temper Trump’s worst impulses, which led to Trump firing Mark Esper after he refused to go along with Trump’s 2020 stolen election claims.

In Hegseth, Trump has found someone who not only dropped the guardrails for him, but seems to delight in pushing the boundaries even further than Trump might like to go. Trump made clear this week he would not have wanted a second deadly strike on survivors of an already disabled drug-running boat. Hegseth has defended that strike with glee, posting memes and boasting of yet another deadly strike.

The growing scandals surrounding Hegseth, both the strike on survivors and the Pentagon inspector general’s report on SignalGate, escalated this week just in time for the new “press corps” of MAGA influencers to take over the Pentagon. The traditional press corps was kicked out of the building after they refused to sign a pledge promising to follow Hegseth’s new rules for journalists, which in effect banned journalists from trying to solicit any kind of information that was not pre-approved. Even reliable pro-Trump outlets like Fox News and Newsmax refused to sign the pledge and subsequently gave up their presence in the building to a cadre of online influencers, many of whom are podcasters in their twenties.

One of those new press corps members, Cam Higby, asked Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson flat-out what his role in the building should be.

“In your mind, what is the purpose of the Pentagon Press Corps? Because it seems to be that a lot of people online, including the former press corps who have been tweeting at me, think that the purpose of the press corps is just to gather classified information and release it to the public. It seems like—if you’re an American journalist, yeah, I mean, you’re not a Chinese spy—why would that be the purpose of your job? I mean, how do you see it?” Higby asked, apparently looking for validation from the very person he is meant to hold accountable.

“Yeah, no, it’s a great question. I think the most important thing for the Pentagon Press Corps is twofold: to hold the administration accountable,” Wilson replied before blasting coverage of the Biden administration. She then said the quiet part out loud:

So holding us accountable, I think, is very important. But also communicating to the American people all of the work we’re doing and all of the work that our warfighters are doing every single day is a huge part of it. And that’s why we wanted to engage new media like all of you and bring you here, because the only people that watch CNN are those who are forced to in airports, right? Now we’ve got people who actually have huge audiences, huge numbers of viewers, and we’re able to get our message directly to the American people. We don’t have to rely on the MSDNC filters anymore. And I think for this department, that’s going to be a huge win.

While this new press corps may be a total affront to everything American democracy and the First Amendment are meant to stand for, in practice, who is in the building and has access to the Pentagon press secretary is likely to have little real impact on the American people’s ability to know what’s happening inside the building. The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and other “mainstream” media outlets have been at the forefront of scooping all the latest facts on Hegseth’s actions and are certain to continue to do so. The only real trend to track going forward will be just how subservient the MAGA influencers are to Hegseth and whether or not any actually publish any real scoops or uncover any actual scandals.

__

This is an opinion piece. The views expressed in this article are those of just the author.

Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press

State of Play

Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.

Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America


More informationabout The White House vs. the press

Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity

State of Play

In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug. 

Fact-checking and its detractors


More informationabout Information integrity

Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics

State of Play

News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.

The White House vs. the press


More informationabout Democracy and politics