PBS Under Pressure
For decades, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting has been the financial backbone of America’s public media system—providing crucial assistance to stations in small towns and rural communities where philanthropy simply isn’t enough. This week, that backbone collapsed.
With the close of the federal government’s fiscal year, the CPB has officially shut down, following a $1.1 billion rescission pushed by Donald Trump and Republicans over the summer. For NPR, PBS, and hundreds of local stations, the political fight in Washington has suddenly become a crisis at home: layoffs, program cuts, and existential questions about survival.
At the center of it all is Paula Kerger, the longest-serving chief executive in PBS history. This week, as PBS faces what she calls the most challenging moment in its history, Kerger spoke with Status about the stakes, the path forward, and why she still sees reasons for hope.
Below is our conversation, lightly edited for style.
This week marked the official end of federal support for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. What was your first thought when you woke up knowing the day had arrived?
Saddened for what has been a profoundly successful public/private partnership that has been challenged. There are great uncertainties about the future of stations serving smaller rural communities. That is why President Lyndon B. Johnson envisioned this partnership to ensure access to all with federal money shoring up areas where philanthropy will be challenged. That said, I do feel hope as I see people across the country stepping up to fill some of the funding gap left by the loss of federal dollars.
For those who might be confused, what impact will this have on PBS?
We are still here, providing the programming and content you know and love. My focus is to ensure that every decision we make going forward has the greatest positive impact on PBS member stations and the people we serve. I firmly believe public media is so important to American democracy that people will fight for it, fund it, and champion it no matter what obstacles we face.
You’ve been at PBS nearly two decades. How does this moment compare with other existential challenges you’ve faced? And how do you plan to weather this crisis?
This is the most challenging moment in…
The rest of this interview is for paid subscribers only.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
Scoop-driven reporting and sharp-edged analysis. See why The Wall Street Journal declared Status a “must-read.”
Gallup survey results. (Courtesy of Gallup)
Trust in Press Craters: Confidence in the media has fallen to a record low in the U.S., with just 28% of Americans expressing trust in newspapers, television, and radio to report news fairly, according to a new Gallup survey…
The remainder of this newsletter is for paid subscribers only.
Scoop-driven reporting and sharp-edged analysis. See why thousands of industry professionals rely on Status.
Already a subscriber? Sign in.
A subscription gets you full access to our nightly newsletter, which includes:
✅ Essential reporting on and analysis of the Fourth Estate, Silicon Valley, Hollywood, the Information Wars, and more.
✅ Hand-curated links to the most consequential stories moving the needle in the key corridors of the industry.
✅ Unlimited access to our online archive where you can read previous editions of the newsletter.
Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press
Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.
Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: State of the business model
The traditional journalism business model has long since collapsed, and news organizations have shrunk or disappeared entirely. While a number of promising experiments are under way, the public has not shown a willingness to buy what news organizations are selling.