News

One by One, Biden’s Closest Media Allies Defect After the Debate

NYT - Media · Michael M. Grynbaum · last updated

The MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, the CNN contributor Van Jones and other pundits who have long supported the president are now urging him to drop out. Reporting from Atlanta Joe Scarborough pursed his lips and adjusted his tie. It was 6 a.m. on Friday, seven and a half hours after a diminished President Biden had gingerly stepped off the debate stage, and the host of “Morning Joe” on MSNBC was about to deliver a painful message to viewers of television’s most reliable redoubt of Biden support. “I love Joe Biden,” Mr. Scarborough began as the cameras flipped on in his home studio in Maine. “I think his presidency has been an unqualified success.” But. “He spent much of the night with his mouth agape and his eyes darting back and forth,” the anchor said. “He couldn’t fact-check anything Donald Trump said. He missed one layup after another after another.” Now, he concluded, “is the last chance for Democrats to decide whether this man we’ve known and loved for a very long time is up to the task of running for president of the United States.” This was no mere act of punditry. Mr. Biden is a skeptic of the news media, but Mr. Scarborough is among a tiny group of commentators that actually has his ear. The president has spent time with the anchor and regularly watches “Morning Joe,” a show that has defended him against all manner of attacks. No more. And Mr. Scarborough was not alone. His defection mirrored that of other longtime Biden media allies who, often in elegiac and pained tones, urged the president on Friday to drop out after his shaky performance in Thursday’s debate against former president Donald J. Trump. Thomas L. Friedman, a columnist for The New York Times and a regular visitor to Mr. Biden’s White House, wrote that he had wept watching the president. “Joe Biden, a good man and a good president, has no business running for re-election,” he said. Evan Osnos, Mr. Biden’s biographer and one of the few journalists granted extensive access to the president, said on CNN that the president had appeared “diminished.” And on CNN, the Democratic analyst Van Jones delivered a soliloquy brimming with emotion, full of poignancy, defiance and regret. “I just want to speak from my heart,” Mr. Jones said minutes after the debate ended. “He’s a good man. He loves his country. He’s doing the best that he can. But he had a test to meet tonight to restore the confidence of the country and of the base, and he failed to do that.” Mr. Jones paused for a breath. “There is time for this party to figure out a different way forward.” Michael M. Grynbaum writes about the intersection of media, politics and culture. He has been a media correspondent at The Times since 2016. More about Michael M. Grynbaum 2024 Elections, CNN, President Joe Biden, Joe Scarborough, Rachel Maddow

Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics

State of Play

News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.

The White House vs. the press


More informationabout Democracy and politics

Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity

State of Play

In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug. 

Fact-checking and its detractors


More informationabout Information integrity