N.Y. State Sues JBS, the Brazilian Beef Giant, Over Its Climate Claims
N.Y. State Sues JBS, the Brazilian Beef Giant, Over Its Climate Claims - The New York Times
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
N.Y. State Sues JBS, the Brazilian Beef Giant, Over Its Climate Claims
The lawsuit says the meatpacking company has made a series of misleading statements about its environmental efforts.
The New York attorney general, Letitia James, on Wednesday sued JBS USA, the American arm of the world’s largest meatpacker, accusing the company of making misleading statements about its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The lawsuit is a major setback for JBS, which is based in Brazil, as it pursues a listing on the New York Stock Exchange.
The lawsuit alleges that JBS has made a series of deceptive statements about its record on climate change, including claims that it will achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040. JBS did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Ms. James cited several instances in recent years when the company claimed it was on the path to being net zero, or not adding any carbon emissions to the atmosphere. One she cited occurred during an onstage interview with Gilberto Tomazoni, the company’s global chief executive, at a New York Times event in September.
Other examples of misleading claims, Ms. James said, include a 2015 industry presentation, a full-page ad that JBS placed in The Times in 2021, and statements that currently appear on the company’s website.
She added that JBS has “used greenwashing and misleading statements to capitalize on consumers’ increasing desire to make environmentally friendly choices,” including with statements such as: “Agriculture can be part of the climate solution. Bacon, chicken wings, and steak with net zero emissions. It’s possible.”
“When companies falsely advertise their commitment to sustainability, they are misleading consumers and endangering our planet,” Ms. James said in a statement. “JBS USA’s greenwashing exploits the pocketbooks of everyday Americans and the promise of a healthy planet for future generations.”
JBS was already under scrutiny for its environmental record, labor practices and past activities. In 2017, its holding company, J&F Investimentos, agreed to pay $3.2 billion in reparations and fines as part of a Brazilian federal investigation after the company acknowledged bribing public officials to sign off on investments so it could expand its business internationally. In a 2020 plea agreement, J&F pleaded guilty to related charges brought by the U.S. Department of Justice.
Since then, the holding company says, it has developed a robust anti-corruption program for JBS, a requirement of the plea deal, though it recently announced it would challenge the fine it had previously agreed to in the 2017 settlement agreement. A Brazilian Supreme Court Justice temporarily suspended payment.
In the live interview with the Times, Mr. Tomazoni said JBS was working to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. “We are so confident that we are doing a great job on that,” he said. “And look, we pledge to be net zero in 2040.”
But JBS’s claim that it would be able to achieve zero emissions was deemed misleading by the National Advertising Review Board last year.
JBS said at the time that it disagreed the advertising board’s “interpretation of how consumers perceive the challenged claims,” but agreed to comply with the recommendation to stop using the net-zero claims in “published statements and advertising claims going forward.”
JBS produces huge quantities of beef, pork and chicken. It has annual revenues of more than $50 billion and an extensive supply chain that includes tens of thousands of farms in the Amazon. A Times investigation found that ranches supplying JBS significantly overlapped Indigenous land, conservation zones or areas that were deforested after 2008, when laws regulating deforestation were put in place in Brazil.
JBS said at the time that the ranches had been in compliance with rules to prevent deforestation when it bought from them, though it acknowledged it couldn’t trace indirect suppliers. It also said it had excluded thousands of suppliers because of irregularities.
Its proposed listing on the New York Stock Exchange has faced strong opposition, drawing together an unusual alliance of environmentalists, other meatpackers and both Republican and Democratic politicians. Last week, JBS said it was delaying plans for the listing until at least the second half of the year.
Glenn Hurowitz, the chief executive of Mighty Earth, a nonprofit group that investigates supply chains that affect forests, said the lawsuit demonstrated how a company’s handling of climate and environmental issues can become an obstacle to business success.
The lawsuit “should be a warning signs to other companies that think environmental concerns can be easily dismissed,” he said.
David Gelles reports on climate change and leads The Times’s Climate Forward newsletter and events series. More about David Gelles
Manuela Andreoni is a Times climate and environmental reporter and a writer for the Climate Forward newsletter. More about Manuela Andreoni
Learn More About Climate Change
Have questions about climate change?
Our F.A.Q. will tackle your climate questions, big and small.
New satellite-based research reveals how land along the East Coast is slumping into the ocean,
compounding the danger from global sea level rise. A major culprit: overpumping of groundwater.
The planet needs solar power.
Can we build it without harming nature? Today’s decisions about how and where to set up new energy projects will reverberate for generations.
Carbon-free electricity has never been more plentiful, but it hasn’t yet been enough to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. We looked at how electricity generation has changed over time
to help you understand today’s global picture.
Singapore is rethinking its sweltering urban areas to dampen the effects of climate change.
Can it be a model for other cities?
Whether you’re looking to make your home more energy-efficient, install solar panels or buy an electric car,
this guide can help you save money and fight climate change.
Did you know the ♻ symbol
doesn’t mean something is actually recyclable? Read on about how we got here, and what can be done.
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”