N.F.L. Ordered to Pay Billions in Sunday Ticket Lawsuit
N.F.L. Ordered to Pay Billions in Sunday Ticket Lawsuit - The New York Times
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
N.F.L. Ordered to Pay Billions in Sunday Ticket Lawsuit
The case, which cut to the heart of the league’s media strategy, centered on a subscription service that aired out-of-market games for roughly $300 a year.
The N.F.L. must pay almost $5 billion in damages for artificially inflating the price of Sunday Ticket, a subscription service offered by DirecTV that showed out-of-market games, a federal jury in Los Angeles decided on Thursday.
The verdict, which capped a monthlong class-action trial and almost a decade of legal wrangling, includes about $96 million in damages for the bars and restaurants that subscribed to the service, and more than $4.6 billion for roughly 2.4 million residential subscribers. Damages in antitrust cases like this are tripled by law, which means the league may have to pay more than $14 billion.
The jury’s damages were most of what the plaintiffs lawyers were seeking. “It’s a great day for consumers everywhere,” said Bill Carmody, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers.
The N.F.L. is expected to appeal the verdict.
“We are disappointed with the jury’s verdict today in the N.F.L. Sunday Ticket class action lawsuit,” Brian McCarthy, a league spokesman, said in a statement. “We will certainly contest this decision as we believe that the class action claims in this case are baseless and without merit.”
Judge Philip Gutierrez, who openly admonished the plaintiffs’ lawyers during the trial in U.S. District Court, will hear post-trial motions next month. He could, in theory, decide that the jury reached an improper verdict. An appeals court could also alter the size of the damages.
Still, the verdict poses a substantial risk to the league, which is a $20 billion juggernaut in large part because of its media deals.
“Juries are inherently unpredictable, but any time there’s a ruling against a sports entity, it’s significant because leagues rarely take these cases all the way to trial,” said Gabriel Feldman, the director of the sports law program at Tulane University.
The civil case cut to the heart of the league’s media distribution strategy, which for more than a half-century has been based on negotiating contracts with networks on behalf of all the teams. More than 90 percent of N.F.L. games are shown on free over-the-air television in the markets of the teams in the games, and many other games are shown in prime time on national networks. The league’s contracts with CBS, Fox, NBC and other broadcasters generate more than $10 billion a year.
Sunday Ticket was a unique product because it packaged out-of-market games already being shown by CBS and Fox and resold them to fans for about $300 a season. The plaintiffs argued that the price was deliberately inflated to limit the number of subscribers. The plaintiffs’ lawyers pointed to an email to N.F.L. executives from ESPN that said the cable sports network was willing to offer Sunday Ticket for only $70 and sell single-team packages.
The league spurned the offer and stuck with DirecTV until 2022, when it struck a new deal with YouTube TV.
During the trial, the league acknowledged that CBS and Fox would be hurt if Sunday Ticket attracted too many subscribers. Commissioner Roger Goodell, who testified last week, said the service was priced as a premium product.
The jury — and many fans — contended that the league could and should offer its games at a lower price, and with more flexible options, like team-only packages. Feldman, the Tulane professor, said the N.F.L. would most likely on appeal restate its case that while it negotiated contracts collectively, it was pro-consumer because it offered so many games over the air for free.
The N.F.L. will argue that “we are not like Coke and Pepsi — we are more like Coke and Coke Zero,” Feldman said. “We are part of the same company and part of the same goals.”
Ken Belson is a Times reporter covering sports, power and money at the N.F.L. and other professional sports leagues. More about Ken Belson
National Football League
Inside the World of Sports
Dive deeper into the people, issues and trends shaping professional, collegiate and amateur athletics.
-
Heart Overrules Home: Euro 2024 has doubled as
a test of identity for millions of Germans with Turkish roots. For many, picking one team to support was an easy decision.
-
How Cornhole Went Pro: It might be America’s most-played sport. Now professional cornhole has
quietly becoming a TV success story.
-
Soccer’s Departing Star: Lionel Messi had said the 2022 World Cup, which his country won, was his last.
Will Copa América 2024 be his goodbye?
-
Remembering Willie Mays: The legendary player, who died at 93, had been perfect for so long that the shock of
seeing baseball get the best of him was the shock of seeing a god become mortal.
-
Cricket’s Rising Profile: Cricket faces notable obstacles before it can obtain widespread popularity in America, but
its most passionate supporters feel positive about its future.
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”