Judge dismisses Kash Patel’s defamation lawsuit against MS NOW analyst’s ‘nightclubs’ comment
Plus more on Patel vs. the press, MS NOW and White House Correspondents’ Dinner
A federal judge in Houston on Tuesday dismissed FBI Director Kash Patel’s defamation lawsuit against an MS NOW analyst who said Patel had reportedly “been visible at nightclubs” more than he had at FBI headquarters. The dismissal came a day after Patel filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic over an article alleging he has engaged in “excessive drinking” and “erratic” behavior as FBI director. Patel sued Frank Figliuzzi, a former FBI assistant director for counterintelligence turned national security analyst, for his comments during a May 2, 2025, “Morning Joe” appearance. “Well, reportedly, he’s been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover building,” Figliuzzi said. MS NOW (formerly known as MSNBC) issued an on-air correction a few days later, with a host saying Figliuzzi’s comment was “a misstatement. We have not verified that claim.” In his decision dismissing Patel’s case, U.S. District Court Judge George Hanks Jr. wrote that Figliuzzi’s statement was “rhetorical hyperbole that cannot constitute defamation” and that “a person of reasonable intelligence and learning would not have taken his statement literally.”
Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press
Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.
Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest
The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.
The White House vs. the press | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Media and the law
Toxic politics and vast shifts in the technology landscape have created a plethora of thorny issues — both legal and ethical — for newsrooms, courts, and regulators.
The Meta-FTC trial | Section 230