It’s Not Officially the Anthropocene but Humans Have Changed the Planet
It’s Not Officially the Anthropocene but Humans Have Changed the Planet - The New York Times
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Whatever We Call This Age, Humans Are Changing the Planet. Here’s How.
Many of our imprints on nature will be preserved in the rocks, scientists say, even if this time isn’t yet recognized as a new geologic epoch.
Coming after nearly 15 years of deliberation, a ruling by geologists on Tuesday feels almost anticlimactic: Our species has not so radically altered our world as to have started a new chapter in its history, at least not yet, a scholarly panel decided.
But even if textbooks and research papers don’t feature the “Anthropocene” epoch anytime soon, earth scientists have no doubt that humans are changing the planet. In deciding whether or not to amend the geologic timeline to reflect this, they contemplated a variety of human-driven changes that will be marked in the rocks for a long time to come.
In the end, several scholars who voted on the Anthropocene question said humankind had left too many different kinds of imprints on nature, over too broad a stretch of time, to be captured neatly by a single starting point, which is what geological timekeeping requires.
Here are some of the planet-spanning changes they considered.
Nuclear fallout
A key part of the case that some scientists made for declaring the start of the Anthropocene epoch was the pulse of radioactive isotopes that hundreds of nuclear detonations scattered across the Earth in the mid-20th century. There’s zero doubt that humans are responsible for these particles, even if they end up in different places at slightly different times.
Some scholars have, however, voiced concern about whether using weapons of mass destruction to signpost humankind’s transformation of the planet would send the wrong kind of message about our time.
Biodiversity changes
Fossilized life tells scientists a lot about what Earth was like in its deep past, and that will no doubt remain the case when future researchers try to study our time. Not only are we losing species at a rapid rate, we have also upended the places where they live and thrive (or fail to thrive), both by destroying their habitats or by domesticating them for agriculture and companionship.
Shifting ground
Our civilization moves and modifies the ground beneath us in very direct ways. We flatten hills to build cities and grow crops. We gouge out the land to extract resources or bury waste. We dam up rivers, stopping them from transporting mud and earth from the continents to the seas. Worldwide, by one estimate, the total volume of sediment that humans move each year is now more than 24 times the amount supplied by rivers.
Fossil fuels
The burning of fossil fuels is adding huge amounts of carbon dioxide and methane to the atmosphere, which together are warming Earth’s surface and oceans. Already, temperatures are rapidly moving away from their relatively stable levels during the present geologic epoch, the Holocene. That’s the period that began 11,700 years ago, when the melting of the glaciers made many parts of the planet habitable to humans.
But industrial activity is also leaving another kind of enduring legacy: Ash from the combustion of coal and fuel oil is finding its way into lake beds, sediments and the seafloor.
Plastics and other pollution
Industrial ash isn’t the only kind of matter that will remain in the mineral record as a distinctive marker of our time. There’s also pesticides, plastics, heavy metals, concrete and fertilizers, not to mention trash of all kinds from landfills.
Learn More About Climate Change
Have questions about climate change?
Our F.A.Q. will tackle your climate questions, big and small.
Two friends, both young climate researchers, recently spent hours confronting the choices that will shape their careers, and the world.
Their ideas are very different.
New satellite-based research reveals how land along the East Coast is slumping into the ocean,
compounding the danger from global sea level rise. A major culprit: overpumping of groundwater.
The planet needs solar power.
Can we build it without harming nature? Today’s decisions about how and where to set up new energy projects will reverberate for generations.
Singapore is rethinking its sweltering urban areas to dampen the effects of climate change.
Can it be a model for other cities?
Whether you’re looking to make your home more energy-efficient, install solar panels or buy an electric car,
this guide can help you save money and fight climate change.
Did you know the ♻ symbol
doesn’t mean something is actually recyclable? Read on about how we got here, and what can be done.
Related Knowledge Center: Climate science
What began as a theory in the 1890s — that industrial emissions of carbon dioxide could increase global temperatures — had progressed to a scientific fact a century later. Scientists across a range of disciplines are studying the impact of the still-growing concentration of carbon dioxide and other so-called “greenhouse gases” in the atmosphere as they call for industrial and governmental policies to slow, then halt, the warming of the planet.