News

Investors Insist Woodside Climate Plans Need Revision - Rigzone News

Rigzone News · last updated

Investors Insist Woodside Climate Plans Need Revision | Rigzone

Investors Insist Woodside Climate Plans Need Revision

Major investors are opposing Woodside Energy Group Ltd.’s climate plans and the chairman’s reelection, raising questions about the strategy of Australia’s largest energy company as it rushes to expand oil and natural gas output.

Funds including the California State Teachers’ Retirement System and Australia’s Aware Super both voted against Richard Goyder’s reappointment and rejected proposals for emissions reduction before an annual meeting on Wednesday. Other shareholders backed directors but rejected the green plans.

Woodside’s climate strategy has been criticized as too slow or unclear, and some investors have raised objections to Goyder’s handling of engagement on the issue. Climate activists also oppose Woodside’s push to advance a $24 billion slate of expansion projects, including the flagship Scarborough liquefied natural gas development in Western Australia.

“We still have some ongoing concerns about Woodside’s plan to be net zero by 2050,” Shaun Manuell, head of Australian equities at AustralianSuper, the country’s largest pension fund and a holder of more than 3 percent of the producer, told a Parliamentary hearing Monday. “Based on that we’ve decided to vote against it and we’ll continue our discussions with the company.”

The outcome of a ballot on the climate plan is non-binding, though Woodside insists that it responds to investor feedback when developing its policies. Final results were scheduled to be lodged with the Australian Securities Exchange later Wednesday.

Goyder, who will step down later this year as Qantas Airways Ltd. chairman after investor and customer unrest, told the Woodside event he had carried out more than 80 meetings on climate change since the start of last year.

“All plans and ideas are improved when they are subject to scrutiny and constructive feedback, and this has been the case for Woodside over the past 12 months,” he told the annual meeting. Goyder confirmed he intended to remain in his post and had “never been more energized and excited.”

Woodside is targeting a 15 percent reduction to its net equity Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 2025 and 30 percent by 2030, it said in a presentation in February. The measure reflects the company’s share of jointly owned operations, includes the use of offsets and is relative to an annual average over 2016 to 2020.

The company also aims to take investment decisions by 2030 on projects able to lower Scope 3 emissions by 5 million tons a year. That pollution — mainly from the burning of the fossil fuels it sells — is by far its biggest source of carbon dioxide emissions, at about 72.8 million tons in 2023, according to the company.

“Woodside’s net zero target is 500 words long and it’s incomprehensible,” Polly Hemming, director of the climate and energy program at the Australia Institute, a think tank that opposes new fossil fuel developments, told the Parliamentary hearing. “It’s like ChatGPT wrote it.”

The producer expects gas demand to rise 50 percent over the next decade, propelled by rising consumption in Asia. That bullish outlook helped spur Woodside’s recent failed attempt to merge with smaller rival Santos Ltd. in a tie-up that would’ve created one of the Asia-Pacific region’s biggest LNG producers.

What do you think? We’d love to hear from you, join the conversation on the Rigzone Energy Network.

The Rigzone Energy Network is a new social experience created for you and all energy professionals to Speak Up about our industry, share knowledge, connect with peers and industry insiders and engage in a professional community that will empower your career in energy.

- South Korea Puts into Service New Oil and Gas Import Terminal
- Are Cyber Attacks a Growing Threat to Oil and Gas Vessels?
- BP Rejects Call for Additional 2 Percent Increase in Pension Rate
- North America Goes Back to Losing Rigs
- Rystad Looks at USA Reimposition of Venezuela Oil Sanctions
- Ten Charged in US Accused of Aiding Venezuela's PDVSA
- Burford Asks US Court to Hand It Argentina's Stake in YPF
- Petrobras Approves Use of Decarbonization Fund for PV Plants
- TotalEnergies to Acquire Remaining Stake in Malaysia's SapuraOMV
- SLB Boosts Revenue in First Quarter, Cites OneSubsea JV

- How Likely Is an All-Out War in the Middle East Involving the USA?
- Iran Acknowledges Drone Attack by Israel and Says It Failed
- JPMorgan, S&P, Rystad Share Views on Oil and Middle East Situation
- Canacol Makes Second Gas Discovery in Weeks in Colombian Basin
- Iran-Israel Conflict Has Potential to Further Disrupt Shipping Industry
- What Would an All-Out War in the Middle East Mean for USA Gasoline Prices?
- Analysts Believe Oil Market Is Underpricing Risk
- Europa Oil & Gas Revenue Hit by Wressle Shutdown
- US Confirms Reimposition of Oil Sanctions against Venezuela
- UK Oil Regulator Fines NEO Energy

- An Already Bad Situation in the Red Sea Just Got Worse
- Oil and Gas Executives Predict WTI Oil Price
- New China Climate Chief Says Fossil Fuels Must Keep a Role
- Oil and Gas Execs Reveal Where They See Henry Hub Price Heading
- Macquarie Strategists Warn of Large Oil Price Correction
- Chevron, Hess Confident Embattled Merger Will Close Mid-2024
- Analysts Flag 'Remarkable Feature' of 2024 Oil Price Rally
- One Dead in PEMEX Platform Fire
- Brand Finance Ranks Most Valuable, Strongest Oil and Gas Brands
- US to Shell Out $4B in First Round of Advanced Energy Tax Credit

Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics

State of Play

Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:

  • Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
  • Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
  • Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
  • Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. 

On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”

More informationabout Climate economics