Industrial policy, populism and the political economy of climate action
Industrial policy, populism and the political economy of climate action | Nature Climate Change
Recent policy progress in the United States shows how populism can help advance climate goals, but at a steep cost. Avoiding setbacks will require curbing protectionist reflexes and harnessing opportunities for global cooperation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
1.
Bistline, J. E. T., Mehrotra, N. & Wolfram, C. Economic Implications of the Climate Provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (The Brookings Institution, 2023);
https://go.nature.com/3PPqfc2
2.
Fransen, T. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 752–755 (2023).
3.
Rodrik, D. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 30, 469–491 (2014).
4.
Driesen, D. M. Environ. Law 49, 379–406 (2019).
5.
Mehling, M. A. Emmanuel Macron’s carbon tax sparked gilets jaunes protests, but popular climate policy is possible. The Conversation (10 December 2018);
https://go.nature.com/4cKnYcg
6.
Staufer, S. J. J. Polit. Ideologies 26, 220–238 (2021).
7.
Kerry, J. et al. Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force Recommendations: Combating the Climate Crisis and Pursuing Environmental Justice (Biden for President, 2020);
https://go.nature.com/3xn6ti5
8.
Congressional Research Service Tax Provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R. 5376) (Library of Congress, 2022);
https://go.nature.com/3TNjh8U
9.
Kleimann, D. et al. World Econ. 46, 3420–3434 (2023).
10.
Clausing, K. A. & Wolfram, C. J. Econ. Perspect. 37, 137–62 (2023).
11.
Popp, D., Vona, F., Grégoire-Zawilski, M. & Marin, G. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 18, 45–65 (2024).
12.
Helveston, J. & Nahm, J. Science 366, 794–796 (2019).
13.
IPCC Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press 2022);
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3
14.
Nemet, G. F. How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-Carbon Innovation (Routledge, 2019).
15.
Andreoni, M. Climate is on the ballot around the world. The New York Times (16 January 2024).
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Driesen, D.M., Mehling, M.A. & Popp, D. Industrial policy, populism and the political economy of climate action. Nat. Clim. Chang. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01995-3
-
Published:
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01995-3
Related Knowledge Center: Climate diplomacy: COP 27
The 27th Conference of the Parties (COP 27) produced a groundbreaking agreement to create a “loss and damage” fund to help developing nations cope with the impact of climate change.
But the conference, held from Nov. 6 to Nov. 20, 2022, in Sharm el-Sheik, Egypt, fell short of a hoped-for agreement to speed reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.