If you give a mouse a cookie...
In this newsletter I want to talk about Tuesday’s announcement from Mark Zuckerberg – a huge pendulum swing in Meta’s content moderation policies, detailed in a blog post titled, “More Speech and Fewer Mistakes”. Much of it was a pretty transparent response to ref-working from the right, so I want to talk about the specific changes, nuance within, and then the longstanding issue of platforms shifting in response to ref-working from politicians and how we users can improve our own experiences here. So: what changed?
Related Knowledge Center: Social media
Social media platforms are the source of news for millions of people — and they have a fraught and ever-shifting relationship with the enterprises that provide that news.
The TikTok ban | The Meta-FTC trial
Related Knowledge Center: Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.
Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity
In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug.
Fact-checking and its detractors
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.