How V Spehar built a news business from under a desk
The data is in: News creators and influencers are a major source of news for Americans, especially people under 30. This is the third edition of Creators of Record, an occasional series of interviews with popular creators about how they do their jobs.
It was technology and culture reporter Taylor Lorenz who first told news creator Vitus “V” Spehar to think of themselves as a journalist.
It was 2022 and Spehar — the 43-year-old best known for their explainers as @UndertheDeskNews on social media — was two years into explaining the news online. They were interviewing Lorenz for their podcast and initially brushed it off. “No I’m not, I’m a TikToker,” Spehar said at the time.
“She was like, ‘No, and actually, that’s irresponsible for you to say. What you are doing is journalism and you need to understand the ethics and expectations. The public thinks you’re a journalist, so you need to be one,’” Spehar recalls Lorenz telling her.
Spehar’s videos — which cover U.S. politics, policy, and culture — are conversational and easy to watch. Donning their signature glasses and sometimes a suit, they don’t shy away from playing trending music, acting, or doing a little dance to help viewers understand news events (like the firing of Department of Homeland Security head Kristi Noem.)
Today, they’re one of the most successful news creators in the industry, with nearly five million followers between TikTok and Instagram. In addition to posting daily news recap videos, Spehar also streams a live newscast on YouTube, sends out a Substack newsletter to more than 184,000 subscribers (nearly 7,000 of whom are paid), interviews politicians, and appears on cable news like CNN and MSNOW. Spehar was also a 2025 fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy.
I chatted with Spehar in February about why they first started reporting from under their desk, how they stay on top of the news cycle, and the business of being a news creator. Our conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
I’m really good at explaining stuff to people. The pandemic came and many people’s lives just stopped. A lot of my friends were chefs and they were making videos cooking. So I started making cooking videos for fun. That turned into making cooking videos while explaining how to apply for PPP loans and shuttered venue grants.
On January 6, [2021], I was wearing a suit from my hips up and Nike shorts on the bottom because I was meeting with the Veterans Affairs Department [on Zoom] about the food programs we were doing for them. I saw the insurrection happening on CNN in the background. I just got under my desk and I thought it was a funny way to approach a difficult situation, as if I was in the Capitol hiding under my desk trying to talk to Mike Pence about invoking the 25th Amendment to bring in the National Guard.
It went viral. My friend Randy was like, “Yo, you better get back under that desk and tell people what’s happening now.” And that’s how Under the Desk News started.
At that time, TikTok was real campy. Everything was silly and showy. I don’t know if it was my theater undergraduate degree kicking in, but I was like, “Let’s do this. This will be fun.”
I am a millennial and I did not know that this was a job. I would have never been like, “Oh yeah, I’m a full-time content creator.” That language didn’t even occur to me. I was still working my food job, [but] it just got to a point where I was starting to get opportunities and to make money [from my videos].
Coming out of that, people are so much more interested in the news, civics, politics, and local government. That’s why I think this work is important from a new media and citizen journalist lens.
TikTok has raised more people out of a dead-end job than any other platform on Earth has. For a lot of folks, becoming “TikTok famous” or getting discoverability in this place has helped them get real serious jobs or start their own genuine businesses. I think that that’s really powerful.
Every night, I know I’m going to do the news. By 7:00 p.m. I’ll post a video like, “It’s Monday night, here’s what happened.” And I’ve just aggregated thoughts in my head all day, things that people have texted me that I think [are] interesting.
I do the Substack with a researcher named Jed Bookout who I was able to hire. I write the Monday editions on Sunday — typically just a weekend wrap. Tuesday is for our deep investigative work. On Thursdays we do a queer-only story, which is written by a freelancer named Lana Leonard. Other than that, I post notes as needed on Substack. Substack is pretty set-it-and-forget-it for me because I have help there.
YouTube is a lot harder than the stuff I do with TikTok and Instagram, where I can just fire off a video. We have a new YouTube show thatwe’re going to pick back up [this month]. For YouTube, we have to script, plan, get guests, book them. That can be a little bit more difficult.
I was very happy to say I was a TikToker for a long time, until it became irresponsible to hide behind that label when people were coming to me expecting journalism that had been fact-checked, that was true, and that the experience I brought to it came from somewhere. The Shorenstein fellowship was super helpful in terms of understanding original source material and being in the swirl with people who are real journalists and real media people and how they act and behave.
But prior to that, the first person who was like, “No, you’re a journalist,” was Taylor Lorenz.
It was early on and I was doing the V Interesting podcast, which also had original reporting in it. I interviewed Taylor about the internet, and she goes, “Well, you’re a journalist.” And I said, “No, I’m not. I’m a TikToker.”
And she was like, “No, and actually, that’s irresponsible for you to say because what you are doing is journalism and you need to understand the ethics and expectation. The public thinks you’re a journalist, so you need to be one.”
That was a really good confidence builder, but also a call-out.
I have such respect for the [news] industry and for the people who do this work, and I didn’t think I was qualified to be one of them. And she was like, “No, you are that.” [She told me that I need to] publish my ethics, my finances, and understand that what people expect of me is journalism. What that means is transparency in how I’m paid, who I work for, who my partners are, what my sources are. All that kind of stuff.
I also go to local newspapers and I see what they’re writing about, what’s on their front pages. That’s how we end up making people feel really seen. Even though I have a national audience, I might pick up something from some random-ass place in Oklahoma that’s really interesting, and then that can become a bigger story.
I also get tips from people. I get hundreds of DMs a day. Sometimes there’s something useful in there. I also look at Google Trends right before we do the news and see if there is something that people are talking about that I missed. Sometimes people are talking about, like, this crazy thing that happened at the Olympics with the curler poking the stone. I’m going to throw that in because it’s something fun. I know people will talk about it in the comments. It’s good to have stories that are not always so hard.
Other than that, I’m looking for the original source. If it was a Supreme Court docket, their opinions, I could look at that. I can look at stuff from the White House. I’ll usually try to have stories from two or three major media outlets that have written about it, and then try to see what I think the story is between their different framings.
We don’t do breaking news. I think that’s a great benefit to me unless I really [understand the subject], because then I have the time to watch it develop as opposed to trying to start [reporting] from scratch. When we do start from scratch, it’s typically only for the Tuesday Substack or YouTube, and that takes weeks or months…that involves your normal journalist stuff of calling people, waiting for them to call you back, verifying it, looking up the original documents, making sure that’s what it says, quoting from books.
I don’t have a problem saying that the mainstream media reported on something. Some other news creators don’t want to do that because their whole brand is built on the idea that mainstream media is lying to you and they’re not, even though a lot of their information comes from the mainstream.
Because of my dyslexia, I learned how to speed read. [Growing up in Connecticut], I was part of a program that pulled some kids out of regular class to go to another place and do more experiential learning…the system basically has you guess what the words are instead of reading them letter by letter, and in that way you can get the gist of what is going on.
It’s permission to receive the letters on the page, and then let your brain fill it in — which, turns out, is not great for reading comprehension. Later in life, I had to learn how to read normally to deal with reading out loud and teleprompter=type things. But i will “turn on” speed reading when i want to get through something super fast.
Some folks have a hard time with that. They don’t want to do that, or they made a lot of money on the first video and maybe just one little thing was wrong in it. That’s expensive, but it’s going to cost you more if you don’t just address it quickly.
But I had told people to follow him as he was talking about these boys going missing because I thought it was interesting and he was really keeping up on it. He said [an investigator] met with him…and then it turned out that he was lying. He had gotten ahead of the story.
I was like, “Look, I know I told you to follow this guy and I think what he was doing at the beginning was really great. I’m really worried about the victims, these men, and their families for what they’ve gone through. But I think he’s obviously lost in the sauce and I no longer endorse his reporting.” I took a little shit for it, but it was fine in the end.
There was another time that I said, “For the first time in history, we’re losing rights instead of gaining them” when Roe v. Wade got overturned. I was very quickly corrected by Black historians, the folks who were like, “No, Dred Scott will tell you that this is not the first time that Americans have lost rights.”
I just wasn’t thinking. I apologized, I corrected it, I said this was an ignorant moment based on my own grief over Roe v. Wade and my perspective as a woman. I should have been more thoughtful with my words and I’m sorry.
The audience is about 70% female, 30% male. I used to have a much bigger conservative audience. I do not anymore and I think that’s directly related to some conservative people leaving conservatism because they consider themselves independent or centrists now, and some people who are conservative going full MAGA.
We’ve surveyed the audience a lot. I actually have a pretty decent-sized military family following, which I appreciate and is interesting. I try to keep them and things that might affect them in mind in a lot of the work that we do.
I was embedded with the Department of Defense for a period of time, and I think that led to it because I was making a lot of DoD content. I hear from them that when I was doing my embed, [my videos were helpful] because a lot of their service members are on deployment, they don’t have access to their phones that much. So they can get caught up without being overwhelmed, or the content being overly partisan or false.
[The embed is] called the Joint Civilian Orientation Conference where you get embedded with the military for about a week. You go to several different bases, you talk to active service members, you learn about what the military’s priorities are. Because we have a civilian-led military, we also require that civilians have oversight of the military to ensure transparency…In my audience, some of them were extremely turned off that I did this because they thought I was going to be making military propaganda, but then I didn’t. So they were like, “okay, fine.”
The things I cared about were the social services and programs that Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin was planning. I wasn’t necessarily interested in how many guns we bought or what we’re doing with ships. It’s not propaganda if you’re talking about how we treat military families, what the plan is, and where it needs to improve. I don’t think it made that big of a difference to folks. They did not like that I shot guns and all that. But you know, when in Rome.
I don’t think that Pete Hegseth has proven that he in any way cares for anyone other than his ideals. I don’t think that the transparency that I was able to have in meetings that I had with active duty members would be there. So it’s kind of like, what’s the point? I don’t want to get anybody in trouble for talking to me, either. I don’t think he values journalism, women, let alone non-binary people. Right now, I do not think that’s a good choice and I’m not going to waste my time .
I also didn’t do the creator thing that they were trying to do with the White House press corps, because you’re not coming in as an independent journalist or creator. You’re coming in as a guest of the press secretary, and that’s loaded.
Monty Mader is another one that is new to me that I’ve been following. Daniella the Knitting Cult Lady is another one I like. She’s a former military member.
@popsmartmedia covers how film and television is influencing American politics. The Tennessee Holler is a great one. Betches. Amanda’s Mild Takes is a great one. Sharon Says So does civics and history. I don’t watch a lot of news aggregators as much as I watch a lot of experts in certain fields.
I subscribe to a lot of local newspapers, because they’re, like, $4 for the year for digital-only. I couldn’t even name them all right now. I subscribe to a lot of Substacks, too. It’s like death by a million paper cuts, $4 here, $7 there.It doesn’t seem a lot until I get my bills at the end of the year and I’m like, “Shit, I spent a lot of money.”
I make a lot and it costs a lot. That’s how it works. We bring in a lot of money through YouTube AdSense on monetized videos. TikTok, for a period of time, was heavily monetized. Now they pay like shit. Then brand deals and partnerships. I have extremely high clickthrough rates and very high trust. I don’t do a lot of ads, but we get paid well when we do them.
Because I choose to live in Rochester, I’m self-funding flights and hotels frequently to D.C., New York, and everywhere else to do the work that I do. If I lived in New York City, my cost of living would be much higher. I find the balance to be much more in my favor to live in Rochester and go to cities when I have to.
Jed, who works with me on Substack, gets a percentage of Substack [revenue]. As it grows, he’s growing with me too. I think that’s fair.
If you’re coming into this world, don’t expect that the money is what it used to be at all. That goes for beauty influencers, news influencers, everyone. I think on TikTok there was a period of time where you could make a decent living, you could do very well on TikTok Shop. I don’t know how saturated it is now for folks just coming in.
When we were fighting the TikTok ban, I was spending so much time in Congress talking about folks who make $200 to $1,000 a month on TikTok. It makes a difference because that’s like the registration fee for a kid to play soccer. I could live in a slightly nicer apartment. I can do a little something even if I make a little money at this. If it brings you joy, do it. But if you think it’ll make you rich, it won’t. If you get lucky and you get an anchor spot at CNN someday, great. But that’s probably not going to happen for everybody.
Lawyers are super important, especially for the amount of contracts that I do that are one-off events or partnerships. Those are expensive. Your accounting gets very tricky especially if you’re working in multiple cities.
Admin. If you want to get somebody to answer your phones, do your brand deals, manage your calendar. It’s super valuable, and that could be costly. Editing is extremely expensive if you don’t know how to edit yourself. It is $250 to $1,000 for a video to be fully professionally edited, depending on how long it is, how many clips you want, how many people were on the stream, subscription services.
Related Knowledge Center: State of the business model
The traditional journalism business model has long since collapsed, and news organizations have shrunk or disappeared entirely. While a number of promising experiments are under way, the public has not shown a willingness to buy what news organizations are selling.
Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom
As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies — they are deploying an array of editorial responses.
The Times and its critics | Washington Post mortem