How Shifting Responsibility for AI Harms Undermines Democratic Accountability
The recent backlash from fans against Taylor Swift’s alleged use of artificial intelligence in a music video is a symptom of a troubling trend: the moralization of individual AI use, which deflects responsibility away from powerful actors like corporations and governments.
Assigning personal responsibility for structural harms is not unique to AI. Climate change activist Greta Thunberg was similarly criticized for using plastic bottles, a supposed sign of hypocrisy. This occurred despite evidence that individual lifestyle choices have limited impact on climate change.
The many environmental, social and political harms of AI systems are by now well-established. And as the push to deregulate AI gains traction, focusing on individual responsibility becomes perilous and misguided, obscuring the systemic failures and eroding the democratic accountability that this moment demands.
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.