How Poynter reported the AI plagiarism story that rattled journalism
In the latest episode of ‘The Poynter Report Podcast,’ we break down how the Nota story came together and what it means for trust in AI
Earlier this month, my Poynter colleague Angela Fu published a story that kicked up a hornet’s nest in the journalism and artificial intelligence world: “An AI company set out to fix news deserts. Instead, it copied local journalists’ work.”
Fu wrote that an AI company called Nota, whose clients included organizations like The Boston Globe and the Institute for Nonprofit News, scrapped its network of local news sites after learning that they contained dozens of instances of plagiarism.
How did the story come about? How were all the instances of plagiarism discovered? What has been the reaction in the AI community? What is happening with Nota?
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property
Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom
As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies — they are deploying an array of editorial responses.
The Times and its critics | Washington Post mortem
Related Knowledge Center: Copyright and intellectual property
With copyright questions already complicated by the emergence of the web in the 1990s, artificial intelligence raised the stakes to a new level.