How bystander video and newsroom analysis undercut the White House narrative on Alex Pretti
An interesting scene is playing out at the White House after the latest shooting death of a protester in Minneapolis.
In the minutes and hours and days after ICU nurse Alex Pretti was shot 10 times and killed by Border Patrol agents on Saturday, many inside the Trump administration immediately pointed fingers at Pretti. They said he was “brandishing” a gun. They called him a “domestic terrorist.” They said he meant to “massacre law enforcement.”
Some conservative media outlets ran with that storyline.
None of these statements were rooted in truth. They came from officials such as Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol chief Greg Bovino. Pretti was also criticized by FBI director Kash Patel and Trump deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has placed the blame on Democratic politicians in Minnesota.
Related stories
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.
Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest
The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.
The White House vs. the press | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Information integrity
In an increasingly fractured media landscape, truth has been a casualty in the public discussion. Coverage has been warped by the business needs of struggling news organizations, and a significant segment of the public relies on bad-faith outlets that are little more than propagandists. While fact-checking has become routine, some organizations are exploring other ways to combat the trends. And misinformation spewed by AI-driven chatbots has become more of a feature than simply a bug.
Fact-checking and its detractors
Related Knowledge Center: Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.