News

Homeland Security is using lie detector tests to hunt for leaks to the press

Poynter · Tom Jones · last updated

The Department of Homeland Security, led by Secretary Kristi Noem, has begun performing polygraph tests on employees to determine if they are leaking information about immigration operations to the media.

During an interview with “Face the Nation” and moderator Margaret Brennan on Sunday, Noem said plans to use the “broad and extensive” authorities of her role, adding, “I plan to use every single one of them to make sure that we’re following the law, that we are following the procedures in place to keep people safe, and that we’re making sure we’re following through on what President Trump has promised — that he’s going to make America safe again.”

The Associated Press’ Christine Fernando noted, “While these polygraph exams are typically not admissible in court proceedings, they are frequently used by federal law enforcement agencies and for national security clearances.”

And in a statement, DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said, “The Department of Homeland Security is a national security agency. We can, should, and will polygraph personnel.”

NBC News’ Julia Ainsley and Jonathan Allen reported that Noem and border czar Tom Homan have blamed lower-than-expected Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrest numbers on leaks to the media revealing where such operations might take place.

Noem posted a video on X last week and wrote, “We have identified criminal leakers within @DHSGov and are preparing to refer these perpetrators to the @DOJ for felony prosecutions. These individuals face up to 10 years in federal prison. We will find and root out all leakers. They will face prison time & we will get justice for the American people.”

Ainsley and Allen wrote, “It was not clear if those two employees Noem referred to had been identified through a polygraph test. It’s also not clear how many employees have been polygraphed or may face polygraph tests, but sources said the employees asked to take the tests so far have been in different agencies across DHS.”

Noem also told Brennan on “Face the Nation,” “Anyone who is leaking information outside of how something is planned for the safety of those law enforcement officers needs to be held accountable for that.”

Again, from several reports, lie detector tests are not uncommon among some federal agencies when it comes to hiring someone. But this is different: This appears to be the first time polygraphs are being used to ask employees specific questions about leaks to the media.

Listen up

The latest episode of “The Poynter Report Podcast” is out today. I sat down with Poynter managing editor Ren LaForme and we talked about our exciting new project — The Poynter 50, a series looking back at 50 moments and people that shaped journalism over the past 50 years and had a lasting impact on its future.

But that’s not all, Ren and I also carved out some time in the pod to discuss some of the latest happenings in the media world, including the closing down of FiveThirtyEight, what’s going on with Jeff Bezos and The Washington Post, and Lester Holt stepping down as anchor of the “NBC Nightly News.”

Listen to “The Poynter Report Podcast” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or Amazon Music (and please don’t forget to leave us a rating and review).

Wait, which is it?

Howard Lutnick, the secretary of commerce, and President Donald Trump himself each went on different Sunday morning news shows and were basically asked the exact same question: Is the U.S. headed for a recession?

You would think they would give the exact same answer. They did not.

During an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” moderator Kristen Welker said to Lutnick, “Consumer sentiment is dropping. Inflation has ticked up. Major banks like JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs now say a recession in the next 12 months is becoming more likely. Should Americans brace for a recession?”

Lutnick told Welker, “Absolutely not. Anybody who bets against Donald Trump. … It’s like the same people who thought Donald Trump wasn’t a winner a year ago. Donald Trump is a winner. He’s going to win for the American people. That’s just the way it’s going to be. There’s going to be no recession in America.”

Lutnick went on to talk about tariffs before adding, “I would never bet on recession. No chance.”

But during an appearance on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Trump was asked by host Maria Bartiromo, “Are you expecting a recession this year?”

Trump hedged, saying, “I hate to predict things like that. There is a period of transition, because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America. That’s a big thing. And there are always periods of … it takes a little time, it takes a little time.”

Regarding the economy, The New York Times’ Luke Broadwater, Colby Smith and Ana Swanson wrote, “Economists have turned gloomier on the economic outlook amid Mr. Trump’s dizzying approach to tariffs, which has fueled considerable uncertainty and hamstrung businesses considering new investments and hiring. The concern is that the ongoing volatility chills this activity even further, intensifying an economic slowdown that is already underway.”

On the move

Political journalist Tara Palmeri is leaving the relatively new startup Puck to strike out on her own on YouTube. Palmeri tells The New York Times’ Jessica Testa, “I don’t want you to go to this YouTube page and think, ‘I could have watched that on a cable channel.’”

Before Puck, Palmeri was at ABC News. She told Testa, “I’ve always felt like there’s never really been a place that I’ve been at home.”

Testa has much more on Palmeri and her move, including this passage: “With an initial grant from YouTube, Ms. Palmeri bought about $10,000 worth of equipment, and tested and hired editors. (She and YouTube both declined to disclose the size of the grant.) In return, she has committed to publishing about four videos per week.”

Here’s Palmeri’s announcement on social media, and here’s her Substack signup page.

Semafor scoop

The Semafor media newsletter had this intriguing scoop Sunday night:

“The New York Times is making major changes to its opinion section, rethinking the frequency and design of its editorials, the makeup of its editorial board, and its policy on endorsements. Opinion editor Kathleen Kingsbury, deputy editor Patrick Healy, and publisher AG Sulzberger are contemplating having other editors in opinion getting more involved in the editorial board, and having fewer people on staff who solely write editorials. Publishing fewer, higher-quality editorials, the thesis goes, will lead to more audience attention.”

The Times is also thinking about shaking up how it handles political endorsements, according to Semafor. It wrote, “Having pulled back from local endorsements, the paper is now considering whether it should weigh in on more races across the country, including the Virginia governor’s race and the New Jersey governor’s race, as well as the New York mayoral primaries and potentially the general election.”

Media tidbits

Residents of the West Bank urban refugee camp of Nur Shams evacuate their homes and carry their belongings as the Israeli military continues its operation in the area on Wednesday, March 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Majdi Mohammed)

Hot type

More resources for journalists

  • This Poynter Leadership Academy is our flagship workshop for experienced managers and leaders. Apply by March 24.
  • Gain a deeper understanding of Immigration policy with Poynter’s Beat Academy training. Enroll now.
  • Elevate your editing expertise with the Poynter ACES Advanced Certificate. Enroll now.
  • Ditch work-life balance for a more sustainable approach. Sign up for this six-week email course to discover the unique formula that helps you thrive.

Have feedback or a tip? Email Poynter senior media writer Tom Jones at tjones@poynter.org.

The Poynter Report is our daily media newsletter. To have it delivered to your inbox Monday-Friday, sign up here.

Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics

State of Play

News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.

The White House vs. the press


More informationabout Democracy and politics

Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press

State of Play

Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.

Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America


More informationabout The White House vs. the press

Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest

State of Play

The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.

The White House vs. the press  |  Voiceless America 


More informationabout Free speech and public protest