In graphic detail: The long road to accountability for social media platforms
Last week’s trials marked a turning point for social media. For the first time, big tech giants were held accountable for causing harm to children – and there were consequences.
First, there was the New Mexico case against Meta, in which a jury found the platform liable for violating the State’s Unfair Practices Act, and the company was fined $375 million. Then there was the California case –based on social media addiction – for which a jury found both Meta and YouTube liable for negligence, with Meta 70% responsible for the harm caused, and ordered to pay $4.2 million in damages while Alphabet (on behalf of YouTube), had to fork out $1.8 million.
Together, these rulings signal a fundamental shift – where they’ll be judged not just on the content they host, but how the platforms themselves are built and designed. And that could impact their growth, future revenue, and more regulations.
Related stories
Related Knowledge Center: Social media
Social media platforms are the source of news for millions of people — and they have a fraught and ever-shifting relationship with the enterprises that provide that news.
The TikTok ban | The Meta-FTC trial
Related Knowledge Center: Media and the law
Toxic politics and vast shifts in the technology landscape have created a plethora of thorny issues — both legal and ethical — for newsrooms, courts, and regulators.
The Meta-FTC trial | Section 230