News

Granville to fight New Albany request to drill test well for Intel water - The Newark Advocate

The Newark Advocate · last updated

Granville to fight New Albany request to drill test well for Intel water

Granville will fight New Albany permit request to drill test well for Intel water

In its quest for water to serve the future needs of the computer chip manufacturing complex Intel is building in western Licking County, the city of New Albany is seeking a permit from Licking County to drill a test water well just west of Granville.

New Albany also plans to ask for a permit to drill a test well in the same aquifer a few miles to the north, near Alexandria, on land owned by Colleen Geiger, the same site where Shelly Materials wants to build and operate concrete- and asphalt-mixing plants.

Officials in Granville village and township remain alarmed by the potential daily extraction of millions of gallons of water from — and potential contamination of — the aquifer, the same underground water supply that provides drinking water to Granville and Alexandria, which buys potable water from Granville.

New Albany sent a letter last week to Licking County Planning Manager Brad Mercer, asking for a permit to drill a well on part of the 106 acres of farmland that Granville Township Trustee Dan VanNess sold to The New Albany Co. late last year. The letter says engineers working for the city want to conduct a test over 72 hours, drawing a total of 11 million gallons or more of water out of the ground and into Raccoon Creek.

The city of New Albany is seeking a permit to work in the flood plain along Raccoon Creek west of Granville to drill a test water well.

Granville Village Manager Herb Koehler said the village will ask the Licking County Planning and Development office to deny the permit New Albany seeks to drill a test well in the floodplain along Raccoon Creek, which flows through land above the aquifer and helps recharge Granville’s well field.

"We would take any administrative means at our disposal to address the permit process," Koehler said. "If there’s an avenue to do something to contest it, we intend to do that."

If the village can’t stop the drilling, Koehler said, village officials expect that New Albany officials will hold to their promise to keep the village, township and county informed every step of the way and provide results of New Albany’s test.

New Albany Director of Community Development Jennifer Chrysler said the city will keep Granville informed about the permit and, if approved, details of its plans to drill the test well and the results of the test.

Chrysler said June is the earliest New Albany could conduct the test, and it would only test when conditions are right. For example, New Albany would consider a concern Koehler raised about testing during a dry spell or drought conditions.

"The timing is very important," Koehler said. "If you stress the aquifer purposely during a dry period, it could run wells dry."

Koehler also is concerned about the effect of two tests from the same aquifer.

New Albany has not yet officially asked Licking County for a permit for a test well in the floodplain on the Geiger property, but Chrysler said it intends to do so in the near future. She also said the planned test on that site would be during a 24-hour period rather than a 72-hour period and that the two tests would not be done at the same time.

Kristy Hawthorne, program administrator for the Licking County Soil and Water Conservation District, said it will be a challenge for New Albany to secure a permit to work on the Geiger site because of a pending citation. The site owner and Shelly Materials have been cited for violating floodplain regulations, and Hawthorne said no work can be done on the land where the violation occurred until that violation has been resolved.

Koehler and Granville Village Mayor Melissa Hartfield have raised concerns about possible contamination of Granville’s drinking water if pumps are installed west of Granville.

A plume of toxic chemicals from a defunct solvents company has been stationary in the aquifer under Granville for decades. A plume occurs when contaminants are concentrated in a particular place underground. An engineering firm monitoring the plume on behalf of the federal Environmental Protection Agency told village officials that any future wells west of the village drawing millions of gallons of water a day could pull that toxic plume into the village’s well field and pollute drinking water supplies.

Chrysler said New Albany officials have been talking with local officials and considering their concerns. They are working to communicate and work with village, township and county authorities and that New Albany is not in a big rush to conduct water well tests.

"There’s no pressure," she said. "Intel is committed to phase one” of its construction plans, and the city of Columbus has promised to supply the 1.5 million gallons a day Intel says it needs for its manufacturing process.

“We’re just gathering data for the future,” Chrysler said, adding they expect a project of this magnitude will take three to five years to complete.

Granville Township Trustee Bryn Bird said the township will work with the village to encourage the county to reject the permit and the water-well testing because the township is concerned about what might come next. If New Albany finds what it believes is a suitable water supply in Granville Township, Bird expects the city will want to drill a commercial well and build a pumping station and the infrastructure needed to get water to the New Albany Business Park in western Licking County.

That land is currently zoned as a conservation district, which means the regulations about the type of activities that could happen on that land are even more restrictive than land zoned for agriculture.

"If they tried to drill a commercial well, it could be outside the zoning," Bird said.

Alan Miller writes for TheReportingProject.org, the nonprofit news organization of Denison University’s Journalism program, which is funded by the Mellon Foundation and donations from readers.

Related Knowledge Center: Offshore wind energy

State of Play

Over the next decade, U.S. offshore wind power is expected to grow from a single 30-megawatt wind farm off Rhode Island to more than 2,000 MW of capacity along the Atlantic Seaboard. There are contracts for wind power off the coasts of Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Maryland, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Virginia.

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory has estimated the United States has over 4,000 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind potential, enough to power the country four times over.

The growth in part being spurred by state solicitations, including in New York, where then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) set a commitment of 9,000 MW of offshore wind by 2035, and in Connecticut, where in June 2021, Gov. Ned Lamont (D) signed legislation authorizing the construction of 2,000 MW of offshore wind by 2030.

The offshore development is also being driven by an investment tax credit set to end in December 2019 and is equal to 12 percent of expenditures. U.S. Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Tom Carper (D-Del.) have introduced a bill to extend the tax credit for up to eight years.

The Interior Department has held eight competitive lease sales that resulted in 15 offshore wind leases over 1.7 million acres that has the potential for 21 GW of capacity. In February 2022, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management completed a bidding process that realized $4.37 billion for 488,000 acres across six lease areas in federal waters off New York and New Jersey.

Projects have also been proposed off the Southeast coast, off California and Hawaii, and for the Great Lakes.

More informationabout Offshore wind energy