News

Grant Shapps earmarks £20bn for new fleet of nuclear reactors in UK

The Guardian - Energy · Alex Lawson · last updated

Grant Shapps earmarks £20bn for new fleet of nuclear reactors in UK | Nuclear power | The Guardian

Grant Shapps has condemned the neglect of Britain’s nuclear industry as a “colossal mistake” as he earmarked £20bn for a fleet of new reactors – but admitted it would take six years to even make a decision on giving projects the green light.

The government formally launched Great British Nuclear(GBN), an independent body designed to aid the delivery of new projects, on Tuesday.

In a delayed speech to industry at the Science Museum in London, Shapps noted that opposition had grown against nuclear power in the 1980s and “eventually that mood even percolated its way into government itself”.

He said: “By the early 1990s, just four decades after Britain had led the world by building the first ever commercial nuclear power station at Calder Hall in Cumbria, our nuclear industry was firmly in decline.

“That was a colossal mistake, consigning us to decades more reliance on fossil fuels … We are heralding the beginning of a new nuclear age, a renaissance in Britain’s nuclear industry.”

Conservative governments have been pioneers of nuclear power since Churchill’s built the world’s first nuclear power station in 1953.— Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP (@grantshapps)

Today we’re continuing that legacy to grow the economy & build a new line of defence against energy warfare.

🇬🇧 Great British Nuclear 🇬🇧 pic.twitter.com/mwVM601LWA July 18, 2023

Shapps was critical of governments of the past, including under Labour, and said the coalition and the pandemic had played a part in holding up Britain’s nuclear efforts.

Alan Whitehead, Labour’s shadow energy minister, said: “It’s shambolic that after 13 years of Tory government, not one of the 10 nuclear sites approved by the last Labour government have been built.”

Alongside the launch, officials published a tender for procurement contracts for a fleet of small modular reactors (SMR) – factory-built plants designed to produce power more quickly than larger counterparts such as Hinkley Point C.

The tender states that between one and four awards could be made, and up to £20bn spent on developing designs and funding construction. However, Shapps stressed that the figure was “not a spending commitment” and a process will begin this year to select “probably between two and four technologies” to build.

A number of manufacturing firms including Rolls-Royce, NuScale and Hitachi are developing competing SMR technologies.

It is unlikely that any of the suggested £20bn of taxpayer funding will be distributed before the next election. A final decision on each project will not occur before 2029 – a date at which Rolls-Royce had hoped to be up and running– with power being produced from the “early 2030s”.
skip past newsletter promotion

after newsletter promotion

GBN will be tasked with helping to deliver the government’s commitment to provide a quarter of the UK’s electricity from nuclear energy by 2050, up from 15% now, and reduce Britain’s dependence on fossil fuels.

However, critics of nuclear argue that projects are repeatedly delayed, over budget and draw time and resources away from renewables such as wind and solar projects.

Separately, Shapps announced £157m of grant funding to support the UK nuclear industry, on top of £700m announced for Sizewell C, a nuclear power plant in Suffolk, last year.

Shapps said the “developer-led” approach to building new plants “just has not delivered”, and that government was playing a more direct role in the industry to give investors more certainty.

Rolls-Royce, which has already received £210m for in public funds for SMRs, hailed the £20bn potential spend as a “vital step forward”, but Greenpeace has labelled the technology a “bad bet”.

Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics

State of Play

Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:

  • Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
  • Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
  • Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
  • Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. 

On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”

More informationabout Climate economics