News

Germany promises €2bn to global Green Climate Fund

Climate Home News · Joe Lo · last updated

Germany’s leader Olaf Scholz has promised to give €2 billion ($2.2 billion) to the United Nations’ flagship climate fund for projects cutting emissions and adapting to climate change around the world.

The Green Climate Fund was set up in 2010 to distribute money from wealthy countries to climate projects in low and middle-income countries. It has spent around $12bn so far funding climate projects but has recently warned of cutbacks because of a lack of resources.

The pledge is a third more than Germany’s previous contribution to the fund. Once confirmed, the money will support climate investment during the 2024-2027 period.

Scholz’s pledge at the Petersberg Climate Dialogue in Berlin today sets the bar for other wealthy nations ahead of the fund’s regular pledging conference in the German city of Bonn in October.

“I appeal to the many traditional and possible new donors – let us continue this success story it is more important than ever before”, Scholz said.


Austria, the only other major nation to make a pledge so far, upped their contribution by just under a quarter to €0.16 billion ($0.18 billion).

Liane Schalatek, who monitors the GCF as a representative of civil society, told Climate Home it was “great that there is an upward trajectory, we would have hoped for a bit more than the [one-third] increase, given the needs and the accelerated phase needed in taking climate action, as well as the importance of the GCF”.

Joe Thwaites, a climate finance campaigner at the National Resources Defense Council, said it was a “critical signal of support to developing countries” and “sets a benchmark for other countries who also need to step up with increased contributions”.

“Mid” ambition

If all governments increase their contributions by a third, the fund will have around $13 billion to spend between 2024 and 2027.

An internal strategy document prepared for the GCF board, and seen by Climate Home, labels $12.5 billion as a middling level of money compared with a “status quo” scenario of $10 billion and a “high” scenario of $15 billion.

Reaching a “mid” scenario instead of the “status quo” means the fund can do more to ensure that everyone on earth is protected by early warning systems and do more to help food systems and ecosystems green transition.

But only in the “high” scenario, the fund would have enough resources to do more to help developing countries’ financial systems work towards a green transition or to promote clean technology innovation, the document says.

First big spender

Germany is historically one of the fund’s biggest donors alongside the UK, France and Japan, who have yet to make their latest pledges.

The USA is unlikely to contribute to the pledging conference, as it needs Congressional approval to do so.

President Biden recently promised $1 billion to the fund. But this is only a partial fulfillment of the $2 billion which President Barack Obama promised before Donald Trump later reneged on.

The post Germany promises €2bn to global Green Climate Fund appeared first on Climate Home News.

Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics

State of Play

Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:

  • Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
  • Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
  • Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
  • Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. 

On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”

More informationabout Climate economics