A Gaggle of Goldbricks
One of the main vehicles by which the press gets answers from the president is the “gaggle”—an ad hoc gathering of reporters and cameras, often occurring as he’s en route to or from the White House. It’s a perfect setting for Donald Trump, because he is skilled at parrying with the press, because the events generate viral clips, and, most important, because journalists often collapse into their roles as bit actors in the president’s drama.
For an example, let’s go back to Friday, August 1. At 8:30am—as happens on the first Friday of every month—the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the previous month’s employment numbers. They weren’t pretty: just 73,000 jobs created in July, along with an unusually sharp reduction of 258,000 jobs in May and June.
As politicians are wont to do, Trump sought to shift the blame. As authoritarians are wont to do, he attacked the civil servants who report the numbers. He quickly fired the bureau’s commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, claiming that she messed up the latest report and had also skewed the numbers last year to hurt his reelection chances: “On November 15, 2024, right after the Election,” he stated on Truth Social, “the Jobs Numbers were massively revised DOWNWARD, making a correction of over 818,000 Jobs—A TOTAL SCAM.”
Trump is wrong. The BLS did report a downward revision of 818,000 jobs, but that happened in August—during the Democratic National Convention and almost three months before the election. That seems like a nice boost for Trump’s campaign.
You might hope that, armed with such an obvious set of lies, our White House press corps would have been prepared, later Friday, when Trump appeared before the gaggle. But no. Asked about McEntarfer’s firing, the president said, “Right after the election, I think on the fifteenth, November 15, she had an eight- or nine-hundred-thousand-dollar [sic], massive reduction. Said she made a mistake.” Trump repeated his false claim and took at least a dozen more questions from the faceless, braying herd. But no reporter challenged him on that point, one that underlies his rationale for taking this unprecedented step.
Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics
News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.
Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press
Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.
Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Fact-checking and its detractors
Fact-checking has become a familiar tool for political reporters to hold office-holders and candidates accountable. But critics ask if fact-checkers sometimes miss the forest for the trees, and if the practice often struggles with false equivalency the way conventional political coverage does.