Donald Trump Threatens To Withhold Support For Lawmakers Who Vote Against Effort To Defund PBS, NPR And Public Media
UPDATED: Donald Trump said that he will withhold support or endorsements for any lawmaker who votes against a White House effort to roll back funding for foreign aid and public media.
The Senate next week is expected to consider a package to rescind $9.4 billion in funding, including $1.1 billion already allocated to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting over the next two years.
Trump posted on Truth Social on Thursday, “It is very important that all Republicans adhere to my Recissions Bill and, in particular, DEFUND THE CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING (PBS and NPR), which is worse than CNN & MSDNC put together. Any Republican that votes to allow this monstrosity to continue broadcasting will not have my support or Endorsement. Thank you for your attention to this matter!”
Trump’s attack on public media is just the latest in his efforts to undermine media outlets that produce and air content that he doesn’t like. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is the entity set up by Congress to distribute grants to public media outlets.
The House passed the rescissions package last month, 214-212, with four Republicans joining all Democrats against. In the Senate, some Republicans want to revise the rescissions package, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said on Wednesday that there would likely be an “amendment process” during next week’s vote.
Per Politico, some Senate Republicans want to change the bill to reduce cuts to AIDS prevention, healthcare and local public stations. Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) has spoken against cuts to rural broadcast stations, per NBC News. The legislation has to pass by July 18, or the funding will remain as allocated.
Advocates have been blanketing social media, PBS’s website is topped with a warning about the pending vote, and figures like Ken Burns have spoken out about the value of public media.
On that note, after Trump’s post, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr went after a PBS outlet in Kansas for an ad urging supporters to call their senators in advance of the vote.
Carr wrote on X, “Federal law prohibits noncommercial stations—including PBS ones—from accepting money in exchange for airing political issue ads. I’ve asked the FCC’s enforcement team to determine whether or not that happened here. I would encourage PBS & NPR to focus more on how they managed to lose America’s trust. That is their problem, not Congress’s work to ensure good stewardship of taxpayer dollars.”
Federal law prohibits noncommercial stations—including PBS ones—from accepting money in exchange for airing political issue ads.
I’ve asked the FCC’s enforcement team to determine whether or not that happened here.
I would encourage PBS & NPR to focus more on how they managed… pic.twitter.com/hRhm3IGeED— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) July 11, 2025
A recent YouGov poll, though, showed that Americans do have a high degree of trust in PBS as a news source, ranking it just below The Weather Channel and the BBC.
PBS and NPR have each sued Trump over his executive order to prohibit funding to the networks. The impact, though, likely will have a greater impact on local stations, which get more than 70% of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s appropriations.
Democrats are expected to stay united in opposition. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has warned that the rescissions package risks Democratic cooperation this fall as Congress needs to pass a new government funding bill. That will require Democratic cooperation to reach the 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. By contrast, the rescissions package requires just a simple majority in the Senate to pass.
“It is absurd to expect Democrats to play along with funding the government if Republicans are just going to renege on a bipartisan agreement by concocting rescissions packages behind closed doors that can pass with only their votes, not the customary 60 votes required in the appropriation process,” Schumer said this week. “Sixty-vote processes almost always ensures bipartisanship.”
Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy.
Related Knowledge Center: The White House vs. the press
Whether it’s the Des Moines Register’s publication of an unfavorable election poll, a routine edit of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris, or the Associated Press’s decision in its authoritative stylebook to continue to use “Gulf of Mexico,” Donald Trump and the White House have used executive authority and legal reprisals in an effort to punish and suppress press coverage that runs contrary to the administration’s preferred narratives.
Democracy and politics | Signalgate | The CBS submission | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: Free speech and public protest
The First Amendment is facing challenging times: Crackdowns on campus protests prompted both-sides claims of intolerance. Attempts to head off dangerous health misinformation have been characterized as violations of free speech. Donald Trump is publicly punishing news outlets that deviate from his administration’s version of events while privately suing some outlets into submission.
The White House vs. the press | Voiceless America
Related Knowledge Center: State of the business model
The traditional journalism business model has long since collapsed, and news organizations have shrunk or disappeared entirely. While a number of promising experiments are under way, the public has not shown a willingness to buy what news organizations are selling.