News

The Culture Wars Came for Wikipedia. Jimmy Wales Is Staying the Course.

nytimes.com · Lulu Garcia-Navarro · last updated

As one of the most popular websites in the world, Wikipedia helps define our common understanding of just about everything. It’s the closest thing the internet has to a public utility. Founded in 2001 by Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales, Wikipedia has always operated as a nonprofit with a decentralized system of editing by mostly anonymous volunteers. There are rules for how people should engage on the site (cordially) and how changes are made (transparently). That has led some to call Wikipedia “the last best place on the internet.”

But recently, the site has become a favorite target of Elon Musk, congressional Republicans and right-wing influencers, who all claim that Wikipedia is biased. (Sanger now says the same.) In many ways, this tension is a microcosm of broader conversations we’re having about consensus, civility, shared reality, truth and facts.

Now Jimmy Wales has written a book titled “The Seven Rules of Trust: A Blueprint for Building Things That Last,” which will be published this month. In it, Wales tries to apply the lessons of Wikipedia’s success to our increasingly partisan, trust-depleted world. I talked to Wales about what, in his view, makes Wikipedia great, the various threats it’s facing and his persistent belief that most people are acting in good faith. And a note: Wales and I spoke several weeks before a man with a gun walked up on the stage at a Wikipedia conference in Manhattan on Friday. You can read more about that incident here.

Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom

State of Play

As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies —  they are deploying an array of editorial responses. 

The Times and its critics  |  Washington Post mortem    


More informationabout Inside the newsroom

Related Knowledge Center: State of the business model

State of Play

The traditional journalism business model has long since collapsed, and news organizations have shrunk or disappeared entirely. While a number of promising experiments are under way, the public has not shown a willingness to buy what news organizations are selling.

Artificial intelligence


More informationabout State of the business model

Related Knowledge Center: Democracy and politics

State of Play

News organizations are scrambling to find a coverage approach that adequately informs the American public about the country’s slide from democracy to authoritarian rule.

The White House vs. the press


More informationabout Democracy and politics