Crop insurance rating: The curious case of STAX - Crop insurance rating: The curious case of STAX - Farm Progress
Crop insurance rating: The curious case of STAX
Crop insurance rating: The curious case of STAXCrop insurance rating: The curious case of STAX
Both STAX and SCO are taking on a newfound importance in the 2023 Farm Bill debate, as improvements to both could serve to reduce the need for ad hoc disaster assistance.
Bart Fischer, Henry Bryant
September 18, 2023
The Stacked Income Protection Plan (STAX) was first offered to cotton producers in 2015. Along with the Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO), STAX is one of the area-wide plans of insurance that are designed to help a grower cover a portion of their underlying crop insurance deductible. Unlike the underlying Multi-Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI) policies, both STAX and SCO trigger indemnities based solely on area-wide losses (i.e., only if the entire county triggers a loss). Both STAX and SCO are taking on a newfound importance in the 2023 Farm Bill debate, as improvements to both could serve to reduce the need for ad hoc disaster assistance. Currently, STAX is still only available to cotton producers whereas SCO is widely available across the country.
In our travels around the country over the last several months, we’ve often been asked about the future of policies like STAX and SCO, and we’ve repeatedly been told that they are simply too expensive. That wasn’t too surprising to us in the case of SCO, because the premium support is just 65%. On the other hand, we were considerably more surprised in the case of STAX because the premium support is 80% – growers must pay just 20% of the premium. Consequently, in this article, we take a closer look at STAX premiums across the country for the 2023 crop year.
Figure 1: 2023 Dryland STAX Premium Rates by County
In the maps that follow, we calculated STAX premium rates (dollars of premium per dollar of liability) for the 2023 crop year assuming a coverage band ranging from 70% to 90% with a 120% protection factor (resulting in the maximum level of coverage of 24%). STAX was also assumed to include the harvest price (i.e., the guarantee can increase at harvest if prices increase during the growing season). Figure 1 illustrates dryland STAX premiums and Figure 2 illustrates irrigated STAX premiums.
As noted in the maps, there is significant variability in premium rates both within and across states, ranging from 28.83% to 81.87% for dryland and 26.7% to 75.82% for irrigated. The highest rate (81.7%) is for dryland cotton production in Bee County, TX. In other words, if the county expected value of the crop is $1,000 per acre, RMA is charging $817 per acre to insure the crop! Even with an 80% premium subsidy, the coverage is cost-prohibitive. One might argue that the rates simply mirror the loss history. In reality, indemnities have been paid in Bee County one time in the eight years since STAX was first introduced. Neighboring San Patricio County has had a very similar indemnity experience (one indemnity in eight years), and they faced a 72.69% premium rate in 2023. On close examination of the maps, it’s clear that almost every state faces situations where there is considerable variability in rates between neighboring counties.
Figure 2: 2023 Irrigated STAX Premium Rates by County
Congress may very well choose to provide additional premium support for area-wide policies in the 2023 Farm Bill. Arguably, buying additional area-wide coverage would make considerably more sense than giving away free deductible coverage via ad hoc assistance after disaster strikes. But, the additional premium support is only effective if the underlying premiums being charged by RMA are reasonable and rational and not otherwise pricing producers out of the market for area-wide insurance, a point Congress may wish to explore as they continue their work on the next farm bill.
Source: Southern Ag Today
Read more about:
STAX Federal Crop Insurance Program
About the Author(s)
You May Also Like
Current Conditions for
New York, NY
72°F Sunny
Day 77º
Night 62º
See Detailed Weather Report
Enter a zip code to see the weather conditions for a different location.
Sep 20, 2023 What’s at stake in carbon pipeline argument
Sep 20, 2023 Closer look at corn, soybean storage, selling decisions
Sep 20, 2023 Big Food regenerative ag push: More talk than action
Sep 19, 2023 What does ADM explosion mean for farmers?
Recommended
LEARN MORE
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”