News commentary

Congress Has One Chance to Require a Warrant. It's About to Miss It.

Tech Policy Press · Claudia Ruiz · last updated

The Fourth Amendment warrant requirement was written to keep the government out of your private life: no warrant, no entry. But our government has found two ways around it: buying your personal information from private companies and weaponizing what you already handed over to it in good faith.

Here’s the trick: while the US government cannot seize your location history without a court order, it can buy it on the open market from a data broker. This widespread and increasingly concerning practice side-steps rules that should apply.

Few people know that even though the government cannot compel your phone company to hand over years of your movements without legal process, it can purchase that same information from a company that extracted it from an app you downloaded to track your steps. The government also cannot demand your financial records without first obtaining authorization from a judge, but it can just buy a profile that combines your utility bills, car registration, credit information, and even address history. These kinds of transactions are now commonplace, including without a warrant, a court order, or even a subpoena.

Related Knowledge Center: Digital privacy and data security

State of Play

If you’re online, you’re generating a constant stream of information about yourself — sometimes voluntarily, sometimes unwittingly — that is assembled and used to craft your online experience. And generate wealth for data brokers. Meanwhile, designers and managers of the digital infrastructure on which the world depends are engaged in a never-ending effort to thwart attempts, by both criminal enterprises and state actors, to exploit vulnerabilities in those systems.   

Signalgate | State surveillance


More informationabout Digital privacy and data security

Related Knowledge Center: State surveillance

State of Play

While government monitoring of personal digital communications has traditionally been associated with authoritarian regimes such as China, the Trump regime has moved to use citizens’ personal information in unprecedented ways.

Digital privacy and data security | FISA — Section 702


More informationabout State surveillance