Climate change, missed opportunities mean it's time for JEA to step up - The Florida Times-Union
Climate change, missed opportunities mean it's time for JEA to step up
Local professor: Time to turn up the heat on JEA, because we need real solutions now
August is usually a time for fun in the sun across the nation, but this summer’s record-high temperatures have put something else in many people’s thoughts. With Jacksonville recently ranked among the top-10 hottest cities in America, we’re not only bracing for extreme temperatures, but the extreme utility bills that accompany them.
It’s no secret that we’re facing daunting electric bills, but it would be a mistake to blame only the weather. Combined with rising temperatures from climate change, a series of misguided decisions and missed opportunities by JEA have added insult to injury. At the end of the day, relief is available — JEA must simply claim it.
I’ve been studying atmospheric temperatures for decades, from working in the Air Force Research Lab to serving as a Science & Technology Policy Fellow in the United States Senate to now teaching chemistry at UNF. I’ve learned the ins and outs of how greenhouse gas emissions can impact our everyday lives — and ultimately end up costing consumers more money on their electric bills.
Sierra Club: JEA plan impractical, doesn’t do enough to reduce dependence on fossil fuels
Up and running: Long-awaited Plant Vogtle reactor finally sending nuclear energy to Jacksonville
[LETTERS LINK]
Unfortunately, even though Jacksonville is one of climate change’s many victims, JEA isn’t doing enough to build a more resilient community.
Last year, renewable energy made up less than 2% of JEA’s energy generation portfolio. This year, the utility announced a new plan that would provide a modest increase in renewable energy production — an improvement, but hardly enough when so much is at stake.
The latest proposal from JEA includes building a costly new gas plant and continuing to rely on an inefficient coal plant — solutions that will lock customers into over $1 billion in costs and fail to provide real relief. With natural gas prices fluctuating wildly in recent year s, this would force families to pay for costs that they can’t control or predict.
To make actual, meaningful progress toward a clean and renewable future for Jacksonville, JEA must look for alternatives to these polluting energy sources and the wild price shocks that come with them. Thankfully, the federal government has prioritized these alternatives, offering nearly $400 billion in funding for clean energy initiatives through the Inflation Reduction Act.
The leaders of our community-owned utility must work more fervently with our neighborhood customers in mind, applying for federal funding to reduce reliance on gas and coal and instead invest in solar.
Further, our city should make the advantages of federal funding more accessible to all residents. The saving opportunities for Jacksonville families are endless — from helping the average family save about $500 a year in utility bills to giving residents a 30% tax break if they choose to switch to clean energy systems as a means of powering their homes.
As a Jacksonville resident, a local educator and a father, I strongly encourage JEA to provide my community with the relief it needs and make a true shift to renewable energy. Our finances need it, our health needs it and the future of our planet needs it.
This sweltering summer — let’s turn up the heat on JEA.
To learn more about the fight to end Jacksonville’s dependence on fossil fuels and commit to a clean renewable energy future, visit RenewJax.org.
Joshua Melko is a Jacksonville resident, University of North Florida professor and former Congressional Science Policy Fellow for the American Chemical Society working on climate, energy grid and environmental issues.
This guest column is the opinion of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of the Times-Union. We welcome a diversity of opinions.
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”