In This Cleveland Newsroom, AI Is Writing (But Not Reporting) the News
Cleveland.com is embracing AI tools, including an AI rewrite desk.
In October of last year, Chris Quinn, the editor of Cleveland.com and the Plain Dealer, posted a job listing for an “AI rewrite specialist.” Quinn imagined this new employee would use an AI chatbot to turn reporting from the newsroom’s journalists into written articles, which the human hire would then fact-check. Quinn’s hope was that reporters would spend more time gathering information, less time typing it up.
Last month, Quinn filled the role with Joshua Newman—who had previously worked at LoneStarLive.com in Austin, covering the University of Texas. By mid-January, Newman was working on stories with AI’s help, using an in-house version of ChatGPT provided by the newsroom’s corporate parent, Advance Local. Quinn was pleased: the plan was working out. He wrote a letter to Cleveland.com readers, as he often does, noting the success of the AI rewrite desk—and calling out journalism schools for failing to instill into students a willingness to embrace AI. “Artificial intelligence is not bad for newsrooms,” he wrote. “It’s the future of them.”
Related Knowledge Center: Local media
The hollowing out of the local news ecosystem has been well documented; in some communities, efforts are underway to reverse the growing news desert.
Related Knowledge Center: Inside the newsroom
As newsrooms struggle with rickety business models and precarious finances — as well as new technologies — they are deploying an array of editorial responses.
The Times and its critics | Washington Post mortem
Related Knowledge Center: Artificial intelligence
On top of a failing business model, newsrooms must navigate the powerful — and not fully reliable — new capabilities of artificial intelligence and the deployment of large language models.
State of the business model | Copyright and intellectual property