Chemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of 'Forever Chemicals' - The New York Times
Chemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’ - The New York Times
Supported by
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
Chemical Makers Sue Over Rule to Rid Water of ‘Forever Chemicals’
Industry groups said the E.P.A. had exceeded its authority in requiring the drinking-water cleanup. The chemicals, known as PFAS, are linked to cancer and health risks.
Chemical and manufacturing groups sued the federal government late Monday over a landmark drinking-water standard that would require cleanup of so-called forever chemicals linked to cancer and other health risks.
The industry groups said that the government was exceeding its authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act by requiring that municipal water systems all but remove six synthetic chemicals, known by the acronym PFAS, that are present in the tap water of hundreds of millions of Americans.
The Environmental Protection Agency has said that the new standard, put in place in April, will prevent thousands of deaths and reduce tens of thousands of serious illnesses.
The E.P.A.’s cleanup standard was also expected to prompt a wave of litigation against chemical manufacturers by water utilities nationwide trying to recoup their cleanup costs. Utilities have also challenged the stringent new standard, questioning the underlying science and citing the cost of filtering the toxic chemicals out of drinking water.
In a joint filing late Monday, the American Chemistry Council and National Association of Manufacturers said the E.P.A. rule was “arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion.” The petition was filed in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.
In a separate petition, the American Water Works Association and the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies said the E.P.A. had “significantly underestimated the costs” of the rule. Taxpayers could ultimately foot the bill in the form of increased water rates, they said.
PFAS, a vast class of chemicals also called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are widespread in the environment. They are commonly found in people’s blood, and a 2023 government study of private wells and public water systems detected PFAS chemicals in nearly half the tap water in the country.
Exposure to PFAS has been associated with developmental delays in children, decreased fertility in women and increased risk of some cancers, according to the E.P.A.
At a public address ahead of the filing on Monday, Brenda Mallory, chair of the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality, defended the Biden administration’s stringent standards. “Everyone should be able to turn on the tap and know that the glass of water they fill is safe to drink,” she said.
At the same event, E.P.A. officials said the new standard was based on the best available science and was designed so that it “would be robust enough to withstand litigation.”
The E.P.A. estimates that it would cost water utilities about $1.5 billion annually to comply with the rule, though utilities have said the costs could be twice that amount. States and local governments have successfully sued some manufacturers of PFAS for contaminating drinking water supplies,
President Biden’s bipartisan infrastructure law, passed in 2021, sets aside $9 billion to help communities address PFAS contamination. The E.P.A. said $1 billion of that money would be set aside to help states with initial testing and treatment.
Hiroko Tabuchi covers the intersection of business and climate for The Times. She has been a journalist for more than 20 years in Tokyo and New York. More about Hiroko Tabuchi
Our Coverage of Climate and the Environment
News and Analysis
-
With the planet in the grips of its highest temperatures in more than 100,000 years, scientists with the U.N. weather agency have crunched the numbers and come to a stark conclusion:
More record-hot years are all but inevitable.
-
Leaders in Alameda, Calif., voted to stop scientists from
testing a cloud-brightening device that might one day be used to artificially cool the planet, overruling city staff members who had found the experiment posed no danger.
-
Human-caused warming has doubled the chances that
southern Brazil will experience extreme, multiday downpours like the ones that recently caused disastrous flooding there, a team of scientists said.
Read More
-
Adopting Orphaned Oil Wells: Students, nonprofit groups and others are
fund-raising to cap highly polluting oil and gas wells abandoned by industry.
-
Struggling N.Y.C. Neighborhoods: New data projects are linking social issues with global warming. Here’s what that means for
five communities in New York.
-
Biden Environmental Rules: The Biden administration has rushed to finalize
10 major environmental regulations to meet its self-imposed spring deadline.
-
F.A.Q.: Have questions about climate change?
We’ve got answers.
Related Knowledge Center: Air emissions
More than 30 years after the last major update of the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Supreme Court has upended the ability of Congress to give the Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies broad scope to combat air pollution, including the emission of greenhouse gases. Meanwhile, further Biden administration efforts to limit emissions face opposition in the courts.