California Climate Agency Bars Staff From Contact With Former Agency Scientist - Capital and Main
California Climate Agency Bars Staff From Contact With Former Agency Scientist
The Slick
California Air Resources Board ordered staff not to engage with ex-colleague after he questioned gas industry claims.
California’s air quality regulatory agency barred staff from communicating with a former top scientist after he criticized gas lobbyists and a director there in an email to California Air Resources Board members and staff. Jim Duffy, who retired from CARB in 2022, had written that the agency and industry representatives made misleading statements about subsidies for clean fuels.
In response to Duffy’s email, CARB climate director Rajinder Sahota emailed fuel policy specialists and scientists at the agency on Oct. 23, prohibiting them from “engaging” with Duffy, who was a CARB fuel chief from 2019 to 2020.
Join our email list to get the stories that mainstream news is overlooking.
Sign up for Capital & Main’s newsletter.
Others who had held positions like Duffy’s at CARB now work for oil and gas business associations. Those former CARB managers have continued to communicate with staff at the agency. A current CARB employee, who spoke anonymously because they feared being fired or other retaliation, said the email regarding Duffy is something Sahota “has never issued for people who are directly lobbying.” The employee said the directive showed “regulatory capture” of CARB by the gas industry.
Sahota’s email to five senior staff members said only, “No staff is to engage with Jim. Unbelievable.”
Neither Sahota, nor any of the staff or board members, responded to detailed questions from Capital & Main. Instead, CARB communications director Lys Mendez sent an excerpt of the Low Carbon Fuel Standards regulation, apparently supporting Sahota’s statement that Duffy had criticized.
Mendez wrote that Sahota’s email forbidding contact with Duffy was intended to “ensure coordination on official responses” and to prevent actions that could violate public meetings laws. (Sahota’s eight-word email did not cite either of those reasons for prohibiting contact with Duffy.)
Since June, Duffy has submitted written public comments to the agency critical of several policies he was once in charge of implementing, including one that rewards dairies and gas companies for collecting methane from cow manure to sell as a fuel for heavy trucks.
Critics claim that the policy does little besides enrich gas companies. Others, including advocates, Central Valley residents and state lawmakers, say the policy is also leading to more cows at dairies, harming rural communities with increased air and water pollution. CARB says there is no data showing its policy is leading to bigger herds.
Methane leaks during the refining process, sending climate pollution into the atmosphere. Opponents of methane subsidies, including Duffy, say the policy diverts money that could instead go to cleaner alternatives, such as electricity from solar energy.
Sahota’s prohibition on contact with Duffy could run afoul of free speech protections that cover government employees, said Leslie Jacobs, a professor of law at McGeorge School of Law specializing in constitutional protections of speech.
In general, an employer cannot stop employees from speaking to members of the public about their jobs, Jacobs said. Employers can block employee communication if it undermines the credibility of the organization, she added. CARB said it is “common protocol and a best practice” to coordinate its official responses, but did not explain why employees couldn’t talk to Duffy.
Since 2013, California has promoted fuels that emit fewer pollutants and greenhouse gases through its Low Carbon Fuel Standards (LCFS) program. It offers incentives for companies to produce fuel from non fossil sources, like manure and landfill methane, as well as diesel made from plants and animal fats. CARB sets annual limits on the amount of carbon a company can emit per gallon of fuel it produces, using a system of credits and deficits to cap emissions on California’s roads.
Gas producers receive subsidies to collect methane — a potent greenhouse gas — from cow manure. They often split the money they receive for collecting methane with the dairy farms where they gather the methane.
During Duffy’s time as a CARB fuel chief, the dairy methane setup remained mostly unchanged. After retiring, he moved to Montana.
Duffy’s Oct. 23
Duffy wrote that Sahota “appeared to misrepresent” the LCFS when she said that refiners who violate clean air laws are barred from subsidies. He noted in his email that there is no such requirement and that he hoped one would be added.
Duffy also said environmentalists were correct to have said that the LCFS program favors dairy methane over solar-generated electricity — an assertion gas companies disputed. The gas industry also lacked evidence, Duffy wrote, that it would have to abandon collecting dairy gas if subsidies ended.
In response to questions, Duffy said he didn’t know why Sahota barred staff from talking to him, but praised her as a “dedicated and passionate public worker.”
Earlier this summer, Duffy visited Sacramento with his wife and met with former colleagues socially, he said. During his tenure Duffy championed CARB’s staff scientists.
In an email to colleagues announcing his retirement in April 2022, Duffy wrote that CARB’s fuel scientists were “the experts” on the LCFS, and they should not cede responsibility “to those who know less and have spent much less time thinking about the issues,” including “stakeholders, consultants, academics, CARB upper management and Board.”
His status as persona non grata stands in contrast with that of other former employees who went on to lobby for gas, said Sasan Saadat, a policy researcher at Earthjustice whose work includes advocating for LCFS reforms. Saadat said he occasionally consults Duffy with technical questions about regulations.
Lobbyists “advocate before CARB while getting a paycheck,” said Saadat. Yet Duffy, who does not work for anybody, “is being marginalized.”
Among those lobbyists is Sam Wade, a former LCFS chief who is now a policy director at the Coalition for Renewable Natural Gas.
CARB will vote on changes to the LCFS in 2024, said spokesperson Mendez.
Copyright 2023 Capital & Main
The Slick7 hours ago
The Slick1 day ago
New Mexico Governor Kickstarts Effort to Overhaul Oil and Gas Regulation
Reinvesting in America2 days ago
Federal Infrastructure Dollars to Upgrade Fragile Indian Country Power Grid
Feet to the Fire4 days ago
Duel in the Desert: Fossil Fuel Giants and Environmentalists Face Off Over Energy Transition at COP28
Class War5 days ago
‘The Kids Are Afraid to Be Themselves’
State of Inequality6 days ago
Why 16 Million Households in Northern and Central California Are About to Pay More for Electricity
Featured Video7 days ago
CLASS WAR: The Temecula School Board Battle
Class War1 week ago
In Temecula, a Fragile Alliance Wants to Recall School Board Culture Warriors
California Uncovered1 week ago
At a Los Angeles Housing Project, Progress Starts by Not Settling for Less
Latest News1 week ago
No Time for Permission (Slideshow)
Feet to the Fire2 weeks ago
Is Pennsylvania Governor’s Deal With Natural Gas Giant a PR Stunt? Some Think So.
Feet to the Fire4 days ago
Duel in the Desert: Fossil Fuel Giants and Environmentalists Face Off Over Energy Transition at COP28
Latest News4 weeks ago
‘They Can’t Breathe’
Striking Back2 weeks ago
Is Affordable Housing a New Worker’s Right?
Reinvesting in America2 days ago
Federal Infrastructure Dollars to Upgrade Fragile Indian Country Power Grid
The Slick4 weeks ago
Pennsylvania Governor’s Deal With Fracking Company Splits Environmentalists
State of Inequality2 weeks ago
As Public Support for Unions Grows, U.S. Laws Still Favor Employers
The Slick1 day ago
New Mexico Governor Kickstarts Effort to Overhaul Oil and Gas Regulation
State of Inequality4 weeks ago
After Five Years in Fighting Disney in Courts, Anaheim Living Wage Law to Take Effect
Reinvesting in America2 weeks ago
Can New York City’s Infrastructure Boom Change the Face of Its Workforce?
Featured Video7 days ago
CLASS WAR: The Temecula School Board Battle
Featured Video6 months ago
Excavating the Future: Stopping AAPI Hate
Excavating The Future6 months ago
Excavating the Future: Stopping AAPI Hate
Excavating The Future7 months ago
Excavating the Future: Guarding the Hidden Archive
Excavating The Future7 months ago
Excavating the Future: Breaking the Silence
Excavating The Future7 months ago
Excavating the Future: Guarding the Hidden Archive
ILL HARVEST12 months ago
ILL HARVEST
Latest News1 year ago
Kaiser Therapists: Strike Is About Complying With the Law
Latest News1 year ago
‘What They Need Is Someone at Their Side’
Latest News1 year ago
Kaiser Therapists Say Patient Neglect Compels Them to Strike
DONATE
Top Stories
- Feet to the FireNovember 20, 2023
Is Pennsylvania Governor’s Deal With Natural Gas Giant a PR Stunt? Some Think So.
- Feet to the FireDecember 2, 2023
Duel in the Desert: Fossil Fuel Giants and Environmentalists Face Off Over Energy Transition at COP28
- Latest NewsNovember 7, 2023
‘They Can’t Breathe’
- Striking BackNovember 21, 2023
Is Affordable Housing a New Worker’s Right?
- Reinvesting in AmericaDecember 4, 2023
Federal Infrastructure Dollars to Upgrade Fragile Indian Country Power Grid
- The SlickNovember 8, 2023
Pennsylvania Governor’s Deal With Fracking Company Splits Environmentalists
- State of InequalityNovember 22, 2023
As Public Support for Unions Grows, U.S. Laws Still Favor Employers
- The SlickDecember 5, 2023
New Mexico Governor Kickstarts Effort to Overhaul Oil and Gas Regulation
Related Knowledge Center: Climate economics
Climate change is now a driver of the world’s economy. The impact is profound:
- Catastrophic weather events — hurricanes, floods, droughts, high temperatures — are more frequent and more extreme. The cost can be measured in both the initial damage caused and the longer-term impact on the economy.
- Vulnerable communities are increasing climate-related investments, hardening infrastructure and taking other protective measures.
- Investment in carbon capture and storage technologies is increasingly rapidly.
- Governments are making investments and crafting regulations to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
On top of all of this is the cost of uncertainty. As the Fourth National Climate Assessment, released in 2018 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, says, “The assumption that current and future climate conditions will resemble the recent past is no longer valid.”